I
thought release review slides was just one +1. My mistake
Doug
Good point Doug.
This is a case where we vote not unilaterally approve. I believe
that all PMC members should be allowed (encouraged) to vote. As with any vote
at Eclipse, it will pass if there are substantial +1s and no -1s. Here I
suspect that 3 +1s (the norm) should work. That ensures that even if
both co-leads of a project vote +1 there is still at least one other PMC
member. Seems reasonable?
Jeff
On 2010-05-25, at 1:17 PM, Douglas Clarke wrote:
Tom (Equinox project co-lead) submits slides ...
Jeff (Equinox co-lead) gives PMC +1
I
thought we were not supposed to +1 our own stuff?
Doug
+1 for the
Equinox slides
Jeff
On 2010-05-25, at 12:27 PM, Thomas Watson wrote:
It is that time of year again.
Attached is a draft of the
Equinox release review slides for the Helios release (due Friday, May
28th).The RT projects participating in the Helios release need to
prepare the release review slideware and get it approved by the RT-PMC.
Please review and give your +1s.
Tom
(See attached
file: Equinox Project 3.6Release Review.ppt)(See attached file:
Equinox Project 3.6Release Review.pdf) <Equinox
Project 3.6Release Review.ppt><Equinox Project
3.6Release
Review.pdf>_______________________________________________ rt-pmc
mailing list rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
|