[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [rt-pmc] Fwd: [CQ 4044] org.apache.commons.logging Version: 1.1.1
|
I'm happy to call this a works with. FWIW, the other day I did observe this general class of situation to the IP team and EMO. I've not heard back as yet.
Jeff
On 2010-05-03, at 2:19 PM, Jesse McConnell wrote:
> Barb asked for us to have the following discussion... I am inclined to
> agree I suppose based on that this is a bit different then the typical
> virgo 'going into svn for use in release' scenario of the lionshare of
> other virgo dependencies...
>
> which all of that is a topic for Wednesday I believe as well, least I
> thought it was...
>
> anyway, anyone have any thoughts on this?
>
> cheers,
> jesse
>
> --- Comment #6 from Barb Cochrane <barb.cochrane@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 2010-05-03 14:14:26 ---
> Hey Jesse, Bob,
>
> If this package is not going into the Eclipse repository, and is not being
> shipped as part of the project, then it sounds like this might be a "workswith"
> or "exempt pre-req" candidate as defined by Eclipse Guidelines for Third Party
> Dependencies.
>
> http://www.eclipse.org/org/documents/Eclipse_Policy_and_Procedure_for_3rd_Party_Dependencies_Final.pdf
>
> There should be a transparent discussion on the PMC mailing list to determine
> into which category this package falls. I'll remove +1 from the PMC field on
> this CQ until that happens. Once the determination is made, Jesse can you
> please update this CQ with the decision, your +1 and a link to the discussion?
> We can continue processing the CQ after we see that.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Barb
>
> Auto-Generated Text: IPTeam awaiting response from PMC.
>
>
> --
> Configure CQmail: http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the CQ.
> _______________________________________________
> rt-pmc mailing list
> rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc