Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
[rt-pmc] [CQ 3989] SLF4J jul-to-slf4j Version: 1.5.10 (PB CQ3647)

http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3989





--- Comment #3 from Glyn Normington <gnormington@xxxxxxxxxx>  2010-04-22 09:36:05 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > Description:    SpringSource Enterprise Bundle Repository bundle for the
> > piggy-backed JAR with additional generated manifest headers, as is usual for
> > EBR bundles, regarded as not a modification.
> > 
> 
> Can you elaborate?  Are we expecting all bundles to have additional manifest
> headers to be in EBR?  What about all the other bundles eclipse produces?  If
> they are to be included in EBR would they need some special headers?  I don't
> really think it is reasonable to change signed bundles produced by eclipse with
> additional manifest headers.
> 

This is not a blanket attempt to copy the world into EBR. We are simply raising
CQs for the EBR bundles that will be required to do a baseline release of
Virgo.

The description above is really a note to the Eclipse legal people since we
have agreed a standard way of handling EBR bundles which piggy-back on existing
CQs. Essentially, Legal are happy to consider this not a modification as their
IP processes do not pay attention to manifest contents.


-- 
Configure CQmail: http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the CQ.


Back to the top