Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [rt-pmc] Google API Approval

You need a CQ for everything. In this case the PMC is involved at two points. first we help determine if it is a works with or pre-req dependency. Then someone from the PMC approves the CQ requesting the use of the lib as a works with or pre-req dependency as determined in the first step.

The first step should be somewhat of a "group" decision. It doesn't have to be an official vote etc but simply taking the first +1 seems incomplete.  Not to make it complicated but as we have seen, the dependency determination is open to different opinions. The second approval requires only one PMC member to +1 the CQ.

Austin, you will need to state what kind of dependency you are requesting and why it is that kind of dependency.

In the interest of expediting this particular approval, from a RAP point of view I think this is a works with dependency.  RAP works just fine without this. A particular part of RAP needs the lib but people can use RAP very effectively without that part.

Note also that if there is part of this code (e.g., the calling side) that you are planning to actually ship from Eclipse.org then I think you will need second CQ for that part as it would would not be a dependency so much as a contribution.

Jeff



On 2010-02-02, at 1:40 PM, Jesse McConnell wrote:

> AFAIK the part of the CQ process workflow where it needs a +1 from PMC
> member is the only specific blocking point for something like this
> 
> cheers,
> jesse
> 
> --
> jesse mcconnell
> jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 13:35, Austin Riddle <austin.riddle@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> Not to be a bother, but could anyone tell me what the next step for
>> approving the Google API dependency is?
>> 
>> I am expecting the CQ to be approved shortly for the contribution.  Does
>> there need to be a separate CQ opened for the Google dependency?
>> Or is it just a matter of obtaining a +1 from the mailing list?
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> --
>> Austin Riddle
>> Software Engineer
>> Computing and Information Technology Division
>> Texas Center for Applied Technology
>> Texas Engineering Experiment Station
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> rt-pmc mailing list
>> rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> rt-pmc mailing list
> rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc



Back to the top