[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Hi Jeff,
Jeff McAffer wrote:
I am fine with this. As there are quite a few interested parties on
the identified bug it would be good to get some concrete confirmation
that the bug is in fact addressed.
Yeah, I agree :). Since I'm without access to an NTLMv2 proxy getting
this info is critical (i.e. see this comment
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=252002#c101).
Also, since some additions/changes to p2 are not yet in place (i.e. as
described in the comment), that also obviously has yet to be done (I'm
attempting to coordinate with p2 committers).
As a point of interest, can you say roughly how many bugs have been
fixed for this release?
Here's a query that shows this. Note that all of the bugs with [rest]
or [tweethub] in subject are yet to be incorporated into ECF (i.e. they
are enhancements that are not yet approved by Eclipse IP, and so will
not be in 3.1):
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&classification=RT&product=ECF&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=2009-06-20&chfieldto=Now&chfield=bug_status&chfieldvalue=RESOLVED&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=
Scott
Jeff
On 24-Aug-09, at 1:35 PM, Scott Lewis wrote:
Hi PMCers,
ECF would like to have it's 3.1 release correspond with the Galileo
3.5.1 maintenance. The main reason for this request is this bug
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=252002
which to workaround most simply/effectively requires the addition of
a new ECF API/service interface (to disable/enable filetransfer
providers at runtime). Just to be clear, we're not talking about
other significant API here, or even very many other additions (there
have been a number of bug fixes in other parts of ECF, of
course)...and no other additions within the filetransfer part of ECF.
Obviously there's not much time for review, etc...my apologies about
that, but the implications of the API addition and the above
referenced bug were not immediately clear to me. So can I request a
review for ECF 3.1 (in time for Galileo) with the EMO?
Thanks,
Scott
_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
