[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [rt-pmc] Important: New best practices for approvals
|
why not simply require a minimum 3 [+1] votes over a minimal 72 hour period?
http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 05:03, Jochen Krause<jkrause@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dear fellow PMC members,
> In our last PMC call we agreed on somewhat stricter governance best
> practices for approvals:
> "We will avoid PMC members being the sole approver for requests/votes from
> their own project."
> That means that if a project that you are directly involved in is looking
> for a PMC approval for a CQ, a new committer, a release or any other kind of
> approval you should not be the sole approver of this request. In those cases
> where only one person approves (CQ, committers) you should abstain from
> voting. Usually approvals will happen within a week, if your approval is
> more urgent please convince another PMC member and have him approve (first).
> Jochen
> ###
> Jochen Krause
> EclipseSource
>
> www.eclipsesource.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-pmc mailing list
> rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
>
>
