Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [rt-pmc] Swordfish Release
Title: Re: [rt-pmc] Swordfish Release
All,

Is it an option to wait with that decision until later today? Oliver will provide a complete list of missing CQs. Based on that we can better assess the risk exposure.

Ricco


Am 29.06.09 15:52 schrieb "Jeff McAffer" unter <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

As I understand the current situation, some triage has been done on the CQ discrepancies.  I've approved several CQs that were simply missing. There are however several things that are not yet resolved and we do not have a concrete timeline for addressing them.  With that in mind, Jochen and I agree that the release should be removed pending clarifications.  The rest of the PMC should speak up now if they disagree.

Jeff

Mike Milinkovich wrote:
   
 

RT PMC,
 
 
 
It has come to the attention of the EMO that there are discrepancies between the list of third-party packages listed by the Swordfish project in its Release Review documentation and their filed CQs and what is actually shipping with their release. The EMO would like the PMC’s concurrence to removing this release and revoking Swordfish’s Release Review until these discrepancies are addressed.
 
 
 
I am on vacation this week, if you have any questions please use Wayne Beaton as your EMO point person on this issue.
 
 
 
Thanks.
 
 
 
Mike Milinkovich
 
Executive Director
 
Eclipse Foundation, Inc.
 
Office: +1.613.224.9461 x228
 
Mobile: +1.613.220.3223
 
mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx
 
blog: http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/mike/
 
twitter: @mmilinkov
 
 
 
 


_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
  

Back to the top