Re: [rt-pmc] Swordfish Release

[Mark Rogalski <rogalski@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I agree, there are too many clarifications
required to allow release at this time.

Jeff McAffer <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: rt-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

06/29/2009 08:52 AM

Please respond to
Runtime Project PMC mailing list <rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx, Runtime Project PMC mailing list <rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc	"'Wayne Beaton'" <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>, emo@xxxxxxxxxxx, "'Webmaster'" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxx>, emo-ip-team@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject	Re: [rt-pmc] Swordfish Release

As I understand the current situation, some triage has
been done on the CQ discrepancies.  I've approved several CQs that
were simply missing.  There are however several things that are not
yet resolved and we do not have a concrete timeline for addressing them.
 With that in mind, Jochen and I agree that the release should be
removed pending clarifications.  The rest of the PMC should speak
up now if they disagree.

Jeff

Mike Milinkovich wrote: 
RT PMC,
 
It has come to the attention of the EMO
that there are discrepancies between the list of third-party packages listed
by the Swordfish project in its Release Review documentation and their
filed CQs and what is actually shipping with their release. The EMO would
like the PMC’s concurrence to removing this release and revoking Swordfish’s
Release Review until these discrepancies are addressed.
 
I am on vacation this week, if you have
any questions please use Wayne Beaton as your EMO point person on this
issue.
 
Thanks.
 
Mike Milinkovich
Executive Director
Eclipse Foundation, Inc.
Office: +1.613.224.9461 x228
Mobile: +1.613.220.3223
mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx
blog: http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/mike/

twitter: @mmilinkov

---

_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
  _______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc