Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [rt-pmc] FW: eclipse logo


It would be good to allow the RT graphic to be utilized for sub projects. Otherwise, sub projects will have to generate there own branding.

What does the icon in #12 show?  Are the grey parts links? It seems to me to be a combination of 2D and 3D elements, which I don't think looks very polished.




Thomas Watson/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
Sent by: rt-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

06/10/2009 12:13 PM

Please respond to
Runtime Project PMC mailing list <rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To
Runtime Project PMC mailing list <rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
Re: [rt-pmc] FW: eclipse logo





The RT Marketing page (http://wiki.eclipse.org/RT_Marketing_page) does not explicitly state this intention. It does state the following ...

Eclipse currently has an Eclipse Runtime top-level project and PMC. It is expected that all projects within this top-level project will us the EclipseRT brand on their project web site. They will also be encourage to refer to themselves 'part of EclipseRT'. Eclipse projects, outside of the Eclipse Runtime PMC, that operate as runtime application frameworks, specifically not tool frameworks, will be encourage to use the EclipseRT brand.

But this does not seem to give the impression that subprojects can use the EclispeRT logo as a basis for their own logos. I think it is a fine thing to add to the wiki as a goal. What do others think?

For the new logo proposals:

I like 12 the best. It seems to convey a sense of modularity to me. I also like the looks of 10 but I am not sure what the significance of the Saturn looking planet is. I don't have a big preference on the font used for EclipseRT but I do think the font selected must make RT stand out. For me it is all about the graphic and whether it will be a recognizable icon without the words EclipseRT. For me 12 seems to fit this requirement the best.

Tom



Inactive hide details for Pascal Rapicault ---06/10/2009 10:35:29 AM---I like #12.Pascal Rapicault ---06/10/2009 10:35:29 AM---I like #12.

From:

Pascal Rapicault <Pascal_Rapicault@xxxxxxxxxx>

To:

ian.skerrett@xxxxxxxxxxx, Runtime Project PMC mailing list <rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date:

06/10/2009 10:35 AM

Subject:

Re: [rt-pmc] FW: eclipse logo





I like #12.
Do we envision these logos to be used as a base for subprojects logos? For example I'd like to have a p2 logo, and I was thinking that rather than inventing a totalling new thing, I would reuse the drawing part and tack on p2.

PaScaL

Inactive hide details for "Ian Skerrett" ---06/10/2009 11:18:46 AM---Here are some more options for the EclipseRT logo. I belie"Ian Skerrett" ---06/10/2009 11:18:46 AM---Here are some more options for the EclipseRT logo. I believe this set

From:

"Ian Skerrett" <ian.skerrett@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To:

"'Runtime Project PMC mailing list'" <rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date:

06/10/2009 11:18 AM

Subject:

[rt-pmc] FW: eclipse logo





Here are some more options for the EclipseRT logo.   I believe this set
looks a lot more promising.

Comments/thoughts?

[attachment "ECLIPSE-LO-02a.jpg" deleted by Pascal Rapicault/Ottawa/IBM] [attachment "ECLIPSE-LO-02b.jpg" deleted by Pascal Rapicault/Ottawa/IBM] _______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx

https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc

_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx

https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc

_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc


Back to the top