[rt-pmc] [CQ 2561] Apache tomcat Version: 6.0.18

[emo-ip-team@xxxxxxxxxxx]

http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2561


Barb Cochrane <barb.cochrane@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Depends on|                            |2764, 2765
            Summary|Apache tomcat Version:      |Apache tomcat Version:
                   |6.0.16                      |6.0.18




--- Comment #31 from Barb Cochrane <barb.cochrane@xxxxxxxxxxx>  2008-10-21 15:04:49 ---
(In reply to comment #29)

> > > top 1
> > > switching to newest tomcat version with this upload, so please update CQ if
> > > possible
> > 
> > Done :-)
> opening this CQ the summary still says: 6.0.16...

Well, that's because I'm an idiot.  *Really* did it now though ;-).  

> >> top 2
> > For avoidance of doubt, can you confirm that the jars referenced directly above
> > do not invoke or contain source code from any other package except that in
> > attachment2442 [details] [details], entitled apache-tomcat-6.0.18-src.zip?  
> 
> i wanted to confirm that the jars only contain sources that are in
> attachment2442 [details] but i just noticed that the uploaded sources didnt contain the
> sources for the native connector part (they are available though under the same
> SVN node as the other sources, i just trimmed the first src.zip too much). 
> this i have rectified now with this additional attachment.
> i can't confirm that these sources wont invoke code outside of it. in fact, i
> think this is highly likely because the code *is* what makes tomcat and we have
> other jars which would be useless and not neeed if they were not called from
> within that code.

Okay, so it is my understanding that attachment2446 and attachment2442
constitute the combined subset of source code from Apache Tomcat 6.0.18 that
you require for review.  I'll obsolete the rest, for avoidance of doubt.  

> which brings up top 3, namely that the CQS 2764, 2765, 2710, and as of now 2771
> are pre-reqs for this one. I told so there but not here yet.

Added as pre-reqs now. 

> 
> >> top 4
> > Based on your explanation, I would deduce jasper-jdt.jar is a subset of a
> > plugin, and that you have no need for the entire plugin, rather you wish to
> > extract jasper-jdt.jar from that plugin and reuse it.....in which case (if you
> > follow the flowchart) you would need to enter a CQ.  
> 
> yes, it is the plugin org.eclipse.jdt.core from which tomcat uses only the
> above given (few) classes.
> so, i guess i enter a CQ for these :sigh:, see CQ2771
> also, since the plugin is very old there is no CQ for it as far as i can
> see/search. 
> i had tried to look for JDT -> nothing. i guess that code was check in before
> the IP Process or IPZilla was born.
> (what blissed times these must have been ;-)

Okay THAT made me laugh out loud.  Thank you!  ;-)

> PS: is there already a wiki page for all this exciting 3rd party CQ information
> we are discovering during this process, so other new people dont have to walk
> the same rocky path with trial and errors?
> i'd like to assamble all infos that we have collected so far. 
> Do u want to have a hand in or on this? if there is no page yet: where shall i
> create it? under our SMILA until u can confirm correctneess? 
> 
I'm going to move this question over to email since it is not specific to this
CQ, okay?  Thanks Thomas!


-- 
Configure CQmail: http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the CQ.