[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [recommenders-dev] Snipmatch GSOC
|
2012/2/20 Marcel Bruch
<bruch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Yes, let's see what Doug thinks about it.
Regarding the file names:
I think that file names don't carry any meaningful information. They just serve as "primary key" for the index. All information should be contained in the file.
Agree
Regarding directories:
One directory per snippet type sounds ok. What "kind of snippets" do you have in mind?
I mean personal snippets should be in a directory, common snippets which sync with our remote server snippets repository will be in another directory.
Regarding XML format:
I'd stick to JSON since we use JSON all over the project. For de-serialization we use Google's GSON library. See GsonUtil class to get a first impression on how to use GSON.
Ok, I will read GsonUtil source code.
One last problem, i think i have only code check out permission of SnipMatch, so can you guys grant check in permission of SnipMatch to me ? Or, i just submit patch, you guys check in code for me.
On 20.02.2012, at 09:43, chen cheng wrote:
I agree with file system storage solution. Do not know what Doug's opinion is.
But before coding, we must define some details:
1. One snippet one file, with XML format. Is it OK? Does file name make sense, or just keep them unique.
2. One type of snippets, one directory. Common repositories has its own directory, Personal repositories has its own direcotry. Is it OK?
_______________________________________________
recommenders-dev mailing list
recommenders-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/recommenders-dev
--
Best Regards From Cheng Chen [
chengchendoc@xxxxxxxxx]
