| Re: [rdf4j-dev] workbench+server image on hub.docker eclipse |
|
Hi Jeen,
autch, probably my bad, my docker server is ARM-based, not Intel, so I probably have to push/configure the intel version as well. Can you execute "docker ps --all" to get the ID of the (not running) container, and then "docker logs <id>" to get some more info ?
Thanks
Bart From: rdf4j-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx <rdf4j-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Jeen Broekstra <jeen.broekstra@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 3:57:55 AM To: rdf4j developer discussions Subject: Re: [rdf4j-dev] workbench+server image on hub.docker eclipse Hi Bart,
I finally got around to taking this for a test spin, great that we can start deploying on DockerHub!
Unfortunately, I'm stuck in actually getting it to work. I can pull the image and start the container easily enough, but no joy on actually seeing the Workbench when accessing
http://localhost:8080/rdf4j-workbench. The logs in the container don't show anything (catalina.out is just empty).
What I did:
docker pull eclipse/rdf4j-workbench:2.4.2-testing1
docker run -d -p 8080:8080 -e JAVA_OPTS="-Xms1g -Xmx4g" -v data:/var/rdf4j -v logs:/usr/local/tomcat/logs eclipse/rdf4j-workbench:2.4.2-testing1
After I've done this, docker ps shows:
CONTAINER ID IMAGE COMMAND CREATED STATUS PORTS NAMES
fb11c037a403 eclipse/rdf4j-workbench:2.4.2-testing1 "catalina.sh run" 11 minutes ago Up 5 minutes 0.0.0.0:8080->8080/tcp cranky_turing
But opening http://localhost:8080/rdf4j-workbench on my machine shows an error. In fact it's a very odd error as it says "localhost didn't send any data". Curling to it gives this:
curl: (52) Empty reply from server
Any idea what might be the problem?
Cheers,
Jeen
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 10:28 PM Bart Hanssens (BOSA) <bart.hanssens@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
|