Re: [rdf4j-dev] Solr and Elastic Search

[Mark Hale <mj_hale@xxxxxxxxx>]

Isn't that conclusion a bit rash? How do you know people aren't using them via maven? Or other build systems?

On Friday, July 28, 2017, 1:28:57 PM GMT+1, James Leigh <james.leigh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Thu, 2017-07-27 at 08:53 +1000, Jeen Broekstra wrote:
>
> > On 27 Jul 2017, at 02:47, James Leigh <james.leigh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > Should we deprecate these? Or, have we already?
> They’re not deprecated AFAIK. They’re also still documented as viable
> backends for the search index implementation (see http://docs.rdf4j.o
> rg/programming/#_searchindex_implementations). 
>
> I’m not sure why they’d be left out of the onejar/sdk, though. I
> remember we did a bit of juggling with module renaming and moves at
> the time, and we did deprecate other implementations (Lucene 3 and
> 4). I think we also had some questions around IP for
> Solr/Elasticsearch when transferring the project to Eclipse.

I propose we deprecate them in the next patch release and remove them
altogether in the next minor release. If no body has noticed their
absents in the last two year, then I think we can assume they are not
adding any value to the project.

James
_______________________________________________
rdf4j-dev mailing list
rdf4j-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rdf4j-dev