Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
[rap-dev] Re: rap-dev Digest, Vol 22, Issue 3

Hello R?diger Herrmann!

You were right, I have not shown correctly the title in Firefox browser because a have installed
one of the additions called Adblock Plus which contains a filter from the RU zone.

Thank you very much.

2008/9/15 <rap-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Send rap-dev mailing list submissions to
       rap-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
       https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rap-dev
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
       rap-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxx

You can reach the person managing the list at
       rap-dev-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of rap-dev digest..."


Today's Topics:

  1. Re: browsers compatibility with RAP (R?diger Herrmann)
  2. AW: [rap-dev] Cyclical Dependency in Upload Widget and Demo
     (Stefan Roeck)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 08:58:37 +0200
From: R?diger Herrmann <rherrmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [rap-dev] browsers compatibility with RAP
To: RAP project development-related communication
       <rap-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <48CE079D.4070609@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed

A kind reminder: please use the newsgroup for user-related questions.

 From looking at the screen-shots, it looks like a bug related to
Firefox 3, though I cannot reproduce this on my machine (Win Vista,
latest Firefox). just a wild guess: is there any Firefox add-on
installed that may cause the problem?

Regarding the upload widget, I can't really tell much. You may try
and post this issue on the newsgroup. Stefan, the maintainer of the
Upload Widget, may be able to help.

Cheers,
Rüdiger

Яшин Сергей wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Pre apologize for my English.
> My question is the use of RAP is as follows:
>
> I downloaded the latest version of eclipse Ganymede,
> downloaded using http://download.eclipse.org/technology/rap/update-site
> plug-ins for work
> with RAP and downloaded Target RAP platfrom latest version.
>
> Next, I imported org.eclipse.rap.demo plugin, and run it.
> When the workplace opened in the browser window, I went in the menu
> Window-> Preferences-> Demo Preference Page and set the property
> Presentation to "Demo Presentation" and reload the browser page.
> Show up the workplace with a "Demo Presentation" style, but in my
> browser, Firefox 3.0.2 (the latest version)
> very bad show title (screenshots attached to this letter), on the
> contrary - in the browser, IE 6.X all displayed correctly, as well
> correctly displayed in the browser Google Chrome.
> How can I solve this problem?
>
> Just for firefox browser, I found several problems:
> 1. When I run org.eclipse.rwt.widgets.upload.demo and in the browser
> window opens the corresponding Workplace in Firefox when you press the
> button "Upload" window does not appear to select a file to upload. But
> as browsers IE 6.X and Google Chrome everything is working correctly.
> 2. When i do the standard launch org.eclipse.rap.demo, it will open
> workplace containing View `s, if you press the button to minimize the
> left-top view it will minimized, but if you try to restore the view it
> does not work. The problem manifests itself in all browsers, but always
> only in firefox.
>
> How do I solve this problems?
> What it depends?
>
> Thank you very much.
> --
> Sergei Yashin
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rap-dev mailing list
> rap-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rap-dev



------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 16:36:58 +0200
From: "Stefan Roeck" <Stefan.Roeck@xxxxxx>
Subject: AW: [rap-dev] Cyclical Dependency in Upload Widget and Demo
To: "RAP project development-related communication"
       <rap-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID:
       <65F73C60BD81E34EA0F349325F027C66015D9D9C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi Elias,

I just want to add one thing to this discussion. Today, I tried to compile the upload widget together with the apache-commons bundles from eclipse orbit using Eclipse release engineering tools (RELENG). I failed. The problem seems to be that the RELENG tools can only handle bundles of two kinds:
a) The bundle is available with source and is compiled by PDE
b) The bundle is already compiled and exists as a JAR file.
Unfortunately, apache.commons.[fileupload|io] *are* compiled but not packaged into a jar. In this case, the classpath in the build.xml of org.eclipse.rwt.upload isn't set-up correctly and the dependencies to the apache.commons-bundles cannot be resolved at compile time.

After spending 3-4 hours with this, I restored the old way in our build environment (commons-lib put into one plugin as jars and exporting all needed packages). However, I didn't undo your changes in the RAP Sandbox.

Just for completeness if anybody runs into a similar problem...
Regards,
Stefan.



-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: rap-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rap-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Volanakis, Elias
Gesendet: Montag, 23. Juni 2008 21:21
An: RAP project development-related communication
Betreff: AW: [rap-dev] Cyclical Dependency in Upload Widget and Demo

Hi Stefan,

thanks for your response:

       "However, the current two projects have the advantage that someone just has to download them and can test the upload widget without caring about which other bundles are needed (in which versions, etc)"

This is exactly what I don't like about the cyclic dependency, because it *prevents* someone from just downloading the two projects and having something that works (i.e. he has to fix the cyclic dependency first).

I would like to commit a version of those projects without the cyclic dependency. It will include a readme.txt and a project set file that will automatically check out the required apache libraries from eclipse-orbit. This is IMHO easier than fixing the cyclic dependency :).

Let me know what you think.

Kind regards,
Elias.

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: rap-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rap-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Stefan Roeck
Gesendet: Monday, June 23, 2008 01:18
An: RAP project development-related communication
Betreff: AW: [rap-dev] Cyclical Dependency in Upload Widget and Demo

Hi Elias,

you're right, this cyclic dependency is awful. Your proposal is possible. However, the current two projects have the advantage that someone just has to download them and can test the upload widget without caring about which other bundles are needed (in which versions, etc). Additionally, the demo project will probably never be used in production environment, so it's up to the developer to have a clean dependency graph within its application.

What do you think?
Regards,
Stefan.

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: rap-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rap-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Volanakis, Elias
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Juni 2008 21:16
An: RAP project development-related communication
Betreff: [rap-dev] Cyclical Dependency in Upload Widget and Demo

Hi,

I've been experimenting with the Upload Widget and Demo in the sandbox.
Thanks for making these available.

However there is a cyclical dependency between the upload widget project
(consuming apache.commons.{fileupload,io}) and the upload widget demo
(providing apache.commons.{fileupload,io}; requiring the upload widget).

I propose to fix this by using the plugins from orbit instead
(org.apache.commons.fileupload v1_2 and org.apache.commons.io v_1_3_2)
and delete the libs from the widget demo project.

Let know if there is any reason not to do that. I noticed that the io
library provided was v1_4; however the widget seems to work with v1_3_2
as well.

Thanks,
Elias.

PS: I know we are in a ramp down phase, but AFAIK the sandbox is not
part of the release.
_______________________________________________
rap-dev mailing list
rap-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rap-dev
_______________________________________________
rap-dev mailing list
rap-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rap-dev
_______________________________________________
rap-dev mailing list
rap-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rap-dev


------------------------------

_______________________________________________
rap-dev mailing list
rap-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rap-dev


End of rap-dev Digest, Vol 22, Issue 3
**************************************



--
С уважением,
Сергей Яшин.

Back to the top