Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [qvto-dev] QVT 1.3 Typedef issues

Hi

8.1.14

Well clearly you find Typedefs really useful.

    Regards

        Ed Willink

On 06/10/2015 13:55, Christopher Gerking wrote:
Hi

I'm not yet familiar with typedefs. Could you provide examples for 2) and 3) ?


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: qvto-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:qvto-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Ed Willink
Gesendet: Montag, 5. Oktober 2015 22:35
An: QVTOML developer mailing list <qvto-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Betreff: [qvto-dev] QVT 1.3 Typedef issues

Hi

Adolfo raised a couple of issues that question the integrity of typedef in QVTo.

1) The Constrained Typedef seems to be an underspecified QVTo-specific syntax bloat that could be handled in a general UML-specified way by a Class with an invariant.

2) The added operations library type typedef seems to be an irrelevant SmartQVT implementation detail that conflicts with Complete OCL.

3) Only the textual type synonym has integrity and utility.

Is it going to cause a problem if 2) is deleted completely, 1) is strongly deprecated with the Typedef AS class shrinking to an Element subclass that persists the textual macro for 3).

      Regards

          Ed Willink
_______________________________________________
qvto-dev mailing list
qvto-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/qvto-dev
_______________________________________________
qvto-dev mailing list
qvto-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/qvto-dev


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2015.0.6140 / Virus Database: 4435/10768 - Release Date: 10/06/15







Back to the top