Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [ptp-dev] git problem

Hi,

we use the default Eclipse permissions which don't allow us to delete branches. That should be changed.
Currently we can't change the permissions ourselves. Thus we need to open a bug against Community (see (1) for an example).

Should everyone have the force push option? This isn't really risky because everyone has a full backup of our repository and thus we can easy restore the repo if someone deletes/overwrites something accidentally.
If you think we shouldn't all have force push permission for all main branches we could only ask to have force push permissions for e.g.:
refs/heads/temp/* - e.g. refs/heads/temp/hackathon
refs/heads/feature/*
refs/heads/${username}/*

Maybe we should also ask for Greg to get permissions to change the permissions so that we don't need to ask for permissions changes. Permissions can be seen/edited at: https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/admin/projects/ptp/org.eclipse.ptp,access

1) https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=381280

Roland


On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Brian Watt <bwatt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I too have created a new branch since our workshop and want to manage it's life properly. So I'm curious about this thread and what I'm to do later once it's been merged. At this point I'm still developing it and doing local commits, but in the next two weeks I'll probably be at the same stage that ye ol' hackathon is in.

Bri

On Sep 20, 2013, at 4:34 PM, Roland Grunberg <rgrunber@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> Well it seems to defeat one of the git "features", namely the ability to
>> create and remove branches easily. Is there any reason why everyone
>> shouldn't have this ability, which presumably they had before the gerrit
>> switch?
>>
>> Greg
>
> I would think the reasoning is to make it more difficult to erase/modify
> the history of a git repository although I agree that this is taking things
> a bit far. I can understand not wanting to allow rebases since that can be bad
> practice on a public repo.
>
> With that said, I think some projects have requested that their committers
> get such permissions without having to constantly file bugs about it.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Roland Grunberg
> _______________________________________________
> ptp-dev mailing list
> ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev
_______________________________________________
ptp-dev mailing list
ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev







--
ORNL/UT Center for Molecular Biophysics cmb.ornl.gov
865-241-1537, ORNL PO BOX 2008 MS6309

Back to the top