I have a conflict at 14:00 EST on 2/28.
The other slots are fine.
Team Lead, IBM CDT and RDT
Inactive hide details for Jeff Johnston ---02/24/2012 06:13:22 PM---Hi
Roland, A conference call would be a good idea. I can sJeff Johnston
---02/24/2012 06:13:22 PM---Hi Roland, A conference call would be a good
idea. I can set up a one hour call.
From: Jeff Johnston<jjohnstn@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Parallel Tools Platform general developers<ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sami Wagiaalla<swagiaal@xxxxxxxxxx>, "CDT General developers list."
Date: 02/24/2012 06:13 PM
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] [ptp-dev] Screen-cast of Remote Project Prototype
Sent by: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
A conference call would be a good idea. I can set up a one hour call.
How do any of the following proposed dates and times for this following
week work for you, Chris, et. al.?
Tue Feb 28 1:30- 2:30 pm EST
Wed Feb 29 11:00-12:00 am EST
Wed Feb 29 1:30- 2:30 pm EST
Fri Mar 02 11:00-12:00 am EST
Fri Mar 02 1:30- 2:30 pm EST
These times are clear for Andrew, Sami, and myself on this end.
-- Jeff J.
On 02/23/2012 04:53 PM, Roland Schulz wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
> Looks nice and it would be great to have remote support together with
> autotools support.
> We already have two different remote project types in PTP. Besides the
> original RDT, which Chris described as a reply to your first mail, we
> also have the synchronized project type. While it is slower if one
> to only add a few remote files, it is often faster when editing many
> files and it works with several Eclipse plugins (e.g. Photran,
> PerformanceTools) which don't work with the original RDT.
> In case you are not familiar with that solution you can find more
> information at:
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/PTP/sync-projects(wiki page with summary)
> pages with tutorial)
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=316709(the original bug
> with the reasons to have a 2nd remote project types and links to
> As Chris mentioned to your original email: It might make sense to have
> conference call and see how the different remote project types could be
> combined into a common framework to avoid duplicated effort and have a
> common user interface.
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Jeff Johnston<jjohnstn@xxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:jjohnstn@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> Now that we are all done with Indigo SR2 and Juno M5, I would like to
> continue discussion of my prototype for supporting remote projects
> directly in CDT via proxies for file and command access.
> A picture paints a thousand words so I have put together a short
> demonstration in ogg format that shows how the prototype works in
> creating a remote Autotools C project using an RSE connection from my
> laptop to my desktop. The code for the prototype has already been
> posted in a bug. I have since verified in the bug that it is EPL and
> that I have permission from my employer Red Hat to submit it.
> The demo can be found in ogg form here:
> If you are using a Windows system, you might need to use VLC to view
> -- Jeff J. (Red Hat Inc)
> cdt-dev mailing list
> ORNL/UT Center for Molecular Biophysics cmb.ornl.gov
> 865-241-1537<tel:865-241-1537>, ORNL PO BOX 2008 MS6309
> ptp-dev mailing list
cdt-dev mailing list
ptp-dev mailing list