Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [ptp-dev] Vote for Committer status for Dieter Krachtus has started


+1
Dave


From: Greg Watson <g.watson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Parallel Tools Platform general developers <ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 03/08/2010 04:45 PM
Subject: [ptp-dev] Vote for Committer status for Dieter Krachtus has started
Sent by: ptp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx





Committers,

This is also supposed to be an automatically generated message. It signals that Greg Watson has nominated Dieter Krachtus as a Committer on the tools.ptp project. The reason given is as follows:

Dieter has made a solid contribution to PTP, including providing fixes to the Remote Tools support that is going to become very important in the next release, and is currently working on development of a resource manager for PBS. Dieter has also been participating in meetings to address scalability issues in PTP and will be working on other aspects of scalability in the future. Some other contributions are in these bugzillas:

300891                 Replace use of ssh exec with sftp in other classes.
300623                 Speed improvement of directory listing
302019                 PBS support
300889                 Using sftp instead of ssh exec of cat to transfer files


Since the portal is broken, please vote +1, 0, or -1 by REPLYING to this email. The voting will continue until either all 9 existing Committers have voted or until they have been
given enough time to vote, even if they do not do so (defined as at least one week). Dieter must receive at least three +1s and no -1s for a successful election.

The project Committers eligible to vote are:

 Vivian Kong                
 Mike Kucera
 Craig Rasmussen
 Chris Recoskie                
 Randy Roberts                
 Wyatt Spear                
 Beth Tibbitts                
 Greg Watson                
 David Wootton                

*NOTE*: Successful elections are left open for a maximum of 60 days to allow for processing of paperwork.  After that time the election will be expired, regardless of its current status. Should papework processing on the part of the candidate take more time than allowed, a new election will have to be held.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact your project lead, PMC member, or the EMO <emo@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Greg_______________________________________________
ptp-dev mailing list
ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev



Back to the top