[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [ptp-dev] Updated configure.in for PE proxy
|
Great, thanks.
On May 5, 2009, at 10:54 AM, Dave Wootton wrote:
Greg
I had the same version of configure on my system as the build
version so I
committed the configure script
Dave
Greg Watson <g.watson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: ptp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
05/05/2009 08:34 AM
Please respond to
Parallel Tools Platform general developers <ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To
Parallel Tools Platform general developers <ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
Re: [ptp-dev] Updated configure.in for PE proxy
Dave,
I usually just re-run automake on my system and it regenerates the
files that it needs, then I commit those. You need a version of
automake/autoconf that is at least as recent as the ones used to
generate the current files, otherwise it complains. If you don't have
a recent enough version then let me know and I'll do it.
Greg
On May 5, 2009, at 6:42 AM, Dave Wootton wrote:
Greg
I just committed a change to configure.in for the PE proxy so that
LoadLeveler support can be explicitly excluded by specifying a
--withoutLoadLeveler flag. I didn't commit a new copy of configure
since I
didn't know if configure needed to be generated with the specific
set of
autoconf tools in the Eclipse build system. If I make changes to
configure.in or Makefile.am, do I just commit the configure or
Makefile.in
files as well. Are there other files that should be committed at the
same
time? If just committing the files is not a problem, let me know
and I
will do that.
Dave
_______________________________________________
ptp-dev mailing list
ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev
_______________________________________________
ptp-dev mailing list
ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev
_______________________________________________
ptp-dev mailing list
ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev