Re: [polarsys-iwg] UML Generators proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [polarsys-iwg] UML Generators proposal

From: Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 09:44:23 -0500
Delivered-to: polarsys-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/polarsys-iwg>
List-help: <mailto:polarsys-iwg-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/polarsys-iwg>, <mailto:polarsys-iwg-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/polarsys-iwg>, <mailto:polarsys-iwg-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Eclipse Foundation
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0

On 10/01/2014 9:22 AM, LANGLOIS Benoit wrote:

I think that a best practice is that there is not two mentors from the same company.

Plus all mentors need to be members of the Eclipse Architecture Council.

-- 
Mike Milinkovich
mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx
+1.613.220.3223

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [polarsys-iwg] UML Generators proposal
  - From: Gaël Blondelle

References:
- [polarsys-iwg] UML Generators proposal
  - From: etienne.juliot@xxxxxxx
- Re: [polarsys-iwg] UML Generators proposal
  - From: LANGLOIS Benoit

Prev by Date: Re: [polarsys-iwg] UML Generators proposal
Next by Date: Re: [polarsys-iwg] UML Generators proposal
Previous by thread: Re: [polarsys-iwg] UML Generators proposal
Next by thread: Re: [polarsys-iwg] UML Generators proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Back to the top