[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [platform-update-dev] Change log for updates - is 5 levels enough?
|
I'd rather see a log size of about 1000 for safety. Keeping a more
permanent record of the log does will help support teams greatly for
products.There would be a history trail of what fixes or patches were laid
down etc.
Thanks,
-----------------------------------
Peter Manahan
WebSphere Tools
Build/Install and
Product Architecture
------------------------------------
manahan@xxxxxxxxxx
Pat
McCarthy/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS To: platform-update-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent by: cc:
platform-update-dev-admin@e Subject: [platform-update-dev] Change log for updates - is 5 levels enough?
clipse.org
06/05/2002 08:54 AM
Please respond to
platform-update-dev
Based on testing it looks like the change log kept by the Update Manager
remembers 5 changes. We may need to consider increasing this
number or packaging changes differently.
I started/stopped a base workbench, added a feature link file and
started/stopped, added a 2nd feature link file and again started/stopped.
My change log file is full - any other mods and it will runeth over.
Content below based on the system summary (I've added the ----- for
visibility):
Update Manager Log:
Configuration=Jun 4, 2002 11:53:14 AM
Current configuration=false
Date=Tue Jun 04 11:53:15 EDT 2002
Target=file:E:/Eclipse-int-06-02/eclipse/
Action=Site installed
Status=Success
Date=Tue Jun 04 11:53:15 EDT 2002
Target=
file:E:/Eclipse-int-06-02/eclipse/.config/platform.cfg.metadata/LocalSite.xml
Action=Reconcile
Status=Success
----------------------------------------------------
Configuration=Jun 4, 2002 11:56:02 AM
Current configuration=false
Date=Tue Jun 04 11:56:02 EDT 2002
Target=file:e:/Eclipse-int-06-02/GEF/Runtime/eclipse/
Action=Site installed
Status=Success
Date=Tue Jun 04 11:56:02 EDT 2002
Target=file:E:/Eclipse-int-06-02/eclipse/
Action=Site installed
Status=Success
Date=Tue Jun 04 11:56:03 EDT 2002
Target=
file:E:/Eclipse-int-06-02/eclipse/workspace/.metadata/.config/platform.cfg.metadata/LocalSite.xml
Action=Reconcile
Status=Success
----------------------------------------------------
Configuration=Jun 4, 2002 11:56:35 AM
Current configuration=false
Date=Tue Jun 04 11:56:35 EDT 2002
Target=com.ibm.etools.gef_2.0.0
Action=Enabled
Status=Success
----------------------------------------------------
Configuration=Jun 4, 2002 11:59:11 AM
Current configuration=false
Date=Tue Jun 04 11:59:11 EDT 2002
Target=file:e:/Eclipse-int-06-02/GEF/Runtime/eclipse/
Action=Site installed
Status=Success
Date=Tue Jun 04 11:59:11 EDT 2002
Target=file:e:/Eclipse-int-06-02/GEF/Examples/eclipse/
Action=Site installed
Status=Success
Date=Tue Jun 04 11:59:11 EDT 2002
Target=file:E:/Eclipse-int-06-02/eclipse/
Action=Site installed
Status=Success
Date=Tue Jun 04 11:59:11 EDT 2002
Target=
file:E:/Eclipse-int-06-02/eclipse/workspace/.metadata/.config/platform.cfg.metadata/LocalSite.xml
Action=Reconcile
Status=Success
----------------------------------------------------
Configuration=Jun 4, 2002 11:59:27 AM
Current configuration=true
Date=Tue Jun 04 11:59:27 EDT 2002
Target=com.ibm.etools.gef.examples.logicdesigner_2.0.0
Action=Enabled
Status=Success
As soon as I maintain one of the linked (extension)features I loose
visibility to the first two actions. This seems to be due to the two-pass
processing where each pass (install/reconcile and then enable) is a logged
event.
Can we consider either doubling the number of log entries or managing the
log such that an install/reconcile and then enable is one logged event?
Pat Mc.
