Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [platform-update-dev] plugin paths

There is also a certain clash with PDE bacause PDE uses -classpath to
control what is visible to the run-time instance of the workbench when
launched from PDE launcher. PDE introspects the specified target
installation and assumes that all the plugins found there will be available
(after plug-in path resolution done but the runtime). If you launch your
instance using some custom-made plug-in path file, PDE will ignore it and
what PDE developers will see will not be what application users see when
they use your custom command line.

Regards,

Dejan Glozic, Ph.D.
Application Development
D2/MY7/8200/MKM
IBM Canada Ltd.
Tel. 905 413-2745  T/L 969-2745
Fax. 905 413-4854



                                                                                                                             
                    John                                                                                                     
                    Kellerman/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS       To:     platform-update-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx                                
                    Sent by:                          cc:                                                                    
                    platform-update-dev-admin@e       Subject:     Re: [platform-update-dev] plugin paths                    
                    clipse.org                                                                                               
                                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                             
                    12/06/2001 01:39 PM                                                                                      
                    Please respond to                                                                                        
                    platform-update-dev                                                                                      
                                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                             




Note that while plugin path works you need to consider that, in addition to
worrying about managing your environment, this parameter is not intended to
be supported as a command line parameter for tools built on eclipse.  It
looks like you're attempting to use this as way of solving some
installation requirements you have in Linux.  In general, take a look at
the branding/packaging guide at
http://www.eclipse.org/articles/product-guide/guide.html.  If this doesn't
solve your requirement, I'd suggest a discussion on the newsgroup.

John Kellerman
Product Manager, WebSphere Studio Workbench
OTI - Research Triangle Park, NC
kellrman@xxxxxxxxxx


Please respond to platform-update-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx


Sent by:        platform-update-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx


To:        platform-update-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc:
Subject:        Re: [platform-update-dev] plugin paths



The plugin-path support works in 1.0 and will continue to work in 2.0 ....
but using it basically puts you in a condition of being responsible for
controlling your environment. So, for example, depending on what you do,
you may not pickup any updates done by the update manager (eg. if your
plugin path is not updated to reflect the change).


Please respond to platform-update-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx


Sent by:        platform-update-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx


To:        platform-update-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc:
Subject:        [platform-update-dev] plugin paths



Is the use of the -plugins parameter advisable in Eclipse v1?  We are
building a product on it and it would make a lot of sense to have separate
installs of eclipse itself, and various subcomponents.  Without this we
would end up with each product installing its own copy of the workbench
code.  From my initial tests is seems to work properly, but since there is
a lack of documentation I wanted to find out what the official
recommendation is.

-- Steve Francisco








Back to the top