[platform-ui-dev] Architecture question on the lack of IWorkbenchAdvisor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[platform-ui-dev] Architecture question on the lack of IWorkbenchAdvisor and the use of final in some classes

From: "Ed Burnette" <Ed.Burnette@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 22:05:01 -0500
Delivered-to: platform-ui-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://dev.eclipse.org/pipermail/platform-ui-dev/>
List-help: <mailto:platform-ui-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-ui-dev>, <mailto:platform-ui-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-ui-dev>, <mailto:platform-ui-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Thread-index: AcOqMu7yjbhJpw6GTQ6tVQR/oriwzwP30wMQ
Thread-topic: Architecture question on the lack of IWorkbenchAdvisor and the use of final in some classes

I just noticed there is a WorkbenchAdvisor abstract class but no IWorkbenchAdvisor interface, at least in M5. Was this deliberate or just an oversight?

Compare that to WorkbenchConfigurer and IWorkbenchConfigurer. But... I just noticed WorkbenchConfigurer and some other new internal ui classes are declared "final" - isn't this also going against pattern?

--Ed

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [platform-ui-dev] Architecture question on the lack of IWorkbenchAdvisor and the use of final in some classes
  - From: Nick Edgar

Prev by Date: Re: [platform-ui-dev] Activities and Contexts - Important Update
Next by Date: Re: [platform-ui-dev] Activities and Contexts - Important Update
Previous by thread: [platform-ui-dev] Running latest in HEAD
Next by thread: Re: [platform-ui-dev] Architecture question on the lack of IWorkbenchAdvisor and the use of final in some classes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs