Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
[platform-ui-dev] Canadian Idol - or - follow your role-model: Contexts, Commands, Actions




With interest, I read the Context proposal at


       http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/index.cgi/~checkout~/platform-ui-home/contexts/contexts.html


I have some questions/remarks.


1. Why the digression in layout style. Where is the familiar (boring)
Eclipse header?


2. The proposal makes excellent points on Command vs. Actions, and

made me think of Intentional Programming. Contexts are suggested as

a solution and an extension point in org.eclipse.ui is proposed. Fine.


3. The article does consider hierarchies of contexts, see "parentId".

However, the poor sole who has to define the hierarchy of
contexts for even something as small as Eclipse itself - I pitty him/her.

I think contexts are context-free (how's that for a cool meta-statement).

In other words, a context is not bound to a parent, but a parent defines

what contexts it manages. This modification generates a sort of

multiple inheritance hierarchy (multiple contexts can claim a given

context as child and promote/demote them). From the ground up,

the implementation for Contexts should have excellent
introspection, tracing and debugging capabilities. Just image the

newsgroups: "Why doesn't my Print button show?", "Does one of

the gazillion plugins perhaps promote the "Printer Toner Low"
context?

We should promote that the hierarchy of Contexts stays

shallow. No deep, redundant hierarchies, please.


4. I propose to add the concept of "Role" - a metalevel Context.

Many discussions I have seen in this area describe users of
Eclipse playing different "roles" (architect, developer, tester,
manager, etc). If the userr role is made explicit (in the UI) menu
options that appear/disappear would not surprise the user as much.


5. Contexts will be abused for controlling the entire UI. Someone

will add a nifty small extension and make them Turing complete.

All hell will break loose then. Spaghetti code written in XML.

People will use Contexts as global boolean switches:

   if (Context.isPromoted("Debugging Java")) {

        new MessageDialog("Quit Fooling Around!").open();

   }


6. I suggest a language change:
       promote a Context        -> enable a Context

       demote a Context        -> disable a Context

This is more palleable to non-native speakers (like me)


7. The most fundemental gripe:  Command, Context, and Role

should not be defined in org.eclipse.ui, but in org.eclipse.core.

Everything in the platform is driven by what role a user plays.

Based on their role, certain plugins are loaded and shown.

Heck, the entire loading mechanism may be different. Based

on what context is enabled, help is affected (certain help

categories shown, other hidden). Nothing you don't need for

your Role is loaded at all. Has to be in core for this reason.

Many technologies have the notion of Command. Should

therefore be in a generally available place (also for
headless Eclipse incarnations).

Action is something that belongs in org.eclipse.ui.

Command is something that belongs in org.eclipse.core.actions


Chris Laffra

Back to the top