[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [platform-swt-dev] does an 'empty' swt version exist?
- From: Tom Brus <tombrus@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 15:30:03 +0100
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=ENPT5tGQRaXhV1UYpdB5aaMo9mP2XdNW1eu+otI2PLQ=; b=J7f8Rb8ooOMAQnJuvfozEX7YOpWVtzGu7llVImWpuJeB5BSqK5nffoPNWnlbcrp258 ZWMbDeXGTH5Wu5SJ2d6/sSKo3V6FlKDM+e3bDK7YanpnOASSI1XS+HCp4iEMTRliW5+2 M1zArjftaOL+cLuF/0wSZeh9tz1hqWOyBsXsw=
((Sorry if this is the wrong list...))
Is there an 'empty' swt library implementation?
I have a sort of base functionality in mind that does not depend on any platform but satisfies all swt-using-software that runs against it. Of course it does not show anything ;-) but it could be used as a starting point for new swt libraries or it could be used to run in a headless environment.
We need a way to run our RCP application in a headless environment without changing lots of code that depends heavily on swt.