Ah, now I see. I actually though you were referring to brainless getters and setters since this seems to be quite common in the Java world.
On 31 jan 2011, at 15:33, petru lincu wrote:
|I'm not referring to those brainless getters and setters that do nothing but expose the private member variables.|
What I would like to know is why isn't there any consistency check for e.g. negative heights and wights or a diposed widget or invalid thread access, etc.
--- On Sun, 1/30/11, Jacob <doobnet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Jacob <doobnet@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [platform-swt-dev] SWT Event class design
To: "Eclipse Platform SWT component developers list." <platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sunday, January 30, 2011, 2:55 AM
Yes, but that would be the case if you had setters as well. If you only have getters then I see your point.
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
platform-swt-dev mailing list