[platform-swt-dev] Re: API consistency

["Laurent M." <totolaricot@xxxxxxx>]

Steve Northover wrote:
> Not really.  You don't have to move the discussion over there.  Here is 
> fine.  You need to be aware that we care about native implementations, 
> that's all.

I know... I was also trying to address the 'not supported everywhere' 
argument by starting with a software only version so that something is 
doable everywhere, while still coming up with some form of API that 
would work with hardware support. I can't imagine it can't be done.

> *"Laurent M." <totolaricot@xxxxxxx>*
> Sent by: platform-swt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> 07/09/2008 06:22 PM
> Please respond to
> "Eclipse Platform SWT component developers list."       
>  <platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> 	
> To
> 	platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> cc
> 	
> Subject
> 	[platform-swt-dev] Re: API consistency
>
>
> 	
>
>
>
>
>
> Steve Northover wrote:
>  >
>  > The result of our investigate is on the e4 incubator.  We were able to
>  > implement a prototype portable native animation and effects API for WPF,
>  > Flex and Dojo.  In order for this API to become real, more work in
>  > necessary.  How about moving the discussion over to the e4 inclubator
>  > mailing list?
>  >
>
> :) lol... I have a knack for talking about the wrong things in the wrong
> places don't I .... oh well.. I might get it one day. which one is the
> e4 incubator mailing list?
>
>  >
>  >
>  > *"Laurent M." <totolaricot@xxxxxxx>*
>  > Sent by: platform-swt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>  >
>  > 07/09/2008 05:28 PM
>  > Please respond to
>  > "Eclipse Platform SWT component developers list."      
>  >  <platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>  >
>  >
>  >                  
>  > To
>  >                  platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>  > cc
>  >                  
>  > Subject
>  >                  [platform-swt-dev] Re: API consistency
>  >
>  >
>  >                  
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > but has a name smack in the middle of the official SWT API namespace,
>  > and is structured as the rest of the official projects... so it looks
>  > real but is not real. ok. [I have built a animation extension, so I was
>  > wondering about an official SWT animation naming]
>  >
>  > what about image filtering and transformation? [my previous post] do you
>  > have any plans in that direction that you might want to share?
>  >
>  > Steve Northover wrote:
>  >  >
>  >  > It's part of the e4 prototype and not part of the SWT API.
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  > *"Laurent M." <totolaricot@xxxxxxx>*
>  >  > Sent by: 
> platform-swt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>  >  >
>  >  > 07/09/2008 04:59 PM
>  >  > Please respond to
>  >  > "Eclipse Platform SWT component developers list."      
>  >  >  <platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >                  
>  >  > To
>  >  >                 
>  platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>  >  > cc
>  >  >                  
>  >  > Subject
>  >  >                  [platform-swt-dev] API consistency
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >                  
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  > any specific reason for not making org.eclipse.swt.effects.Effect more
>  >  > generic or Resource subclass?
>  >  >
>  >  > _______________________________________________
>  >  > platform-swt-dev mailing list
>  >  > platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>  >  > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-swt-dev
>  >  >
>  >
>  > _______________________________________________
>  > platform-swt-dev mailing list
>  > platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>  > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-swt-dev
>  >
>
> _______________________________________________
> platform-swt-dev mailing list
> platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-swt-dev