[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[List Home]
|
Re: [platform-swt-dev] Is anyone actively working on the SWT Cocoa bindings?
|
- From: "Alex Blewitt" <alex.blewitt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:25:44 +0000
- Delivered-to: platform-swt-dev@eclipse.org
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=jby/pV21IKsi2cYunkeGLlMc6xBewfyywRnyv/jGc8w=; b=MCIF8E1IEy4yYwyi3YB/mJlDETq+27+fJRPcX5KUzdrI2cPBUoSrxGAHus7dXbbf69ZeCP0ZHHIiy37IODBv5On+1VDc9eIOSoyjGauz52N476IyHJ3PK0YNm/x8k1OLEfTSG2WrN+W4jKBBO1LoiJYALuXZ+KVtp/aoDGKBeH8=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=QlZCM7MJVqtXPldxewQOCR29hX92MSFfpin5BySqYlwhac2D1pfeI++mqh+69Ffj4h+UNM5kQfGpunmjvmwm9xKjkLm+kemriW+QW6sjea/o0KKrXYaCi7s1B7eZQWnljzr6qpYUyHbm8KhyXVlP0Gmg86d6mvH7/Rr2kRszHtQ=
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Randy Hudson <hudsonr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Perhaps as a way to drum up participation, could you shed some light on the
> likely benefits of a Cocoa binding over Carbon (other than empty scrollbars
> not appearing)?
I think the main one is Carbon is getting less supported over time
whilst Cocoa is the future. It's a case of needing it for when it
becomes unsupported, if there is such a thing ;-)
Actually, it's probably not that bad, but Carbon is essentially
maintenance only at this point and new APIs don't get added.
> Is there any chance of seeing new styles or widgets in SWT which gracefully
> degrade on other platforms? Or perhaps are emulated like Coolbar is on
> Mac?
One cool thing I've submitted a patch for is the ability for a window
to use the 'animated property' to be able to do a gradual resize
rather than a sudden change in size.
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=211697
> I know what Steve's going to say: "Open a bugzilla and attach a patch".
> But I'm just wondering where the line is when it comes to supporting
> "hints" that only have a meaning on a single platform. In other words, are
> there patches that wouldn't even be considered?
It's a good question. I also wonder whether annotating bugs in such a
way to annotate that they have patches for consideration - there's a
few bugs in there with patches but seem to take a while to get going.
Alex