[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[List Home]
|
Re: [platform-swt-dev] Is anyone actively working on the SWT Cocoa bindings?
|
- From: "Clayton Hicklin" <chicklin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:17:15 -0500
- Delivered-to: platform-swt-dev@eclipse.org
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=qL6aYDei4BG7MO0VT7VQ0jrfOx7s3HH0SirUsSNKt44=; b=WgmzYCCL4F+E28+1G0TmcoDjebuftOvQYfaQiOfu4EbqAQZ4OFgY75v7kU1cMiSnOnWAxSp8GNF/VS/nTzuEIAJxZIqb9aQId6LF0jQny8SlkAZ8f8eyKX4P112JBAX27oc9w7UGkKtF/gBKCwf/Fo48ObU3YlT6hFyYltu9iaE=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=S2d9264OLg0tRCHP8YSSmQsI8I8IY7VNkQEIS9OM/6sfouQ/H6NHpMvIDgSU5lXbgtrtPqHgCroHCoS/Z199TASD5BrEFnaCriZgLqEX8R+rlHcVDC3VK3kNeTww/pnHqDoiHeusLUW5k5De8KwaRxpC/7u1YYNqVhHI3h5r/Fc=
I would think one of the primary benefits is that the Carbon API is
seemingly "going away" and will not be supported on 64-bit
architectures. Apple has pretty much signaled that future development
for OSX should utilize the Cocoa API.
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Randy Hudson <hudsonr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Perhaps as a way to drum up participation, could you shed some light on the
> likely benefits of a Cocoa binding over Carbon (other than empty scrollbars
> not appearing)?
>
> Is there any chance of seeing new styles or widgets in SWT which gracefully
> degrade on other platforms? Or perhaps are emulated like Coolbar is on
> Mac? Looking briefly at what's available in Cocoa and some possibilities
> are:
> ToolItem: SWT.ICON (== FLAT?)
> Toolbar: SWT.SCOPE, SWT.CAPSULE(or "ROUND")
> Button: SWT.BEVEL (== ETCHED?), SWT.GRADIENT, SWT.ROUND
>
> I know what Steve's going to say: "Open a bugzilla and attach a patch".
> But I'm just wondering where the line is when it comes to supporting
> "hints" that only have a meaning on a single platform. In other words, are
> there patches that wouldn't even be considered?
>
> -Randy Hudson
>
> _______________________________________________
> platform-swt-dev mailing list
> platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-swt-dev
>
--
Clayton Hicklin
chicklin@xxxxxxxxx