[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[List Home]
|
Re: [platform-swt-dev] Is anyone actively working on the SWT Cocoa bindings?
|
- From: "Alex Blewitt" <alex.blewitt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:50:22 +0000
- Delivered-to: platform-swt-dev@eclipse.org
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=mLII9/cUZ33mEPmA5Ir0Rz2i/YmNwRQ7poBpVJA47A8=; b=Zase6WhiGxrVmnUZ6DhKJJ3RcuTCVJ/Cd41ivZoiQexDJCmV2SdZ0F/omPXueZHhUKejNMgkL2uCByItLfrUdjhgMW/RHJj/75MMiYvbFdVw1JUg458Wu0r6PUYvTgXGOAbIhgCjlAc9OA5rqlin9Acl/XQfyqNkkorE+jJIGu8=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Q8kAErY0DXHQiMlvBbIjfm9ZrKzfVM/L+zM6pJH5FI/kd7wJC14Mme8UXjMgMAZf4naxSOCfirXBeMw5zSBoVtGuaqOvHKVmS0hkBrYE3QUPcWYJuF5tlo5UpCw5oLZihBaEdjH3yUzyyunYbNcGtxhgQpyDdUM8DeeAIGARgqU=
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:30 AM, Scott Kovatch <skovatch@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mar 25, 2008, at 4:37 PM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
>
> I made a minor bug report against the Cocoa bindings (#223753) and submitted
> a patch, and was very pleased to see it committed the next day (thanks to
> Kevin Barnes). I would be willing and able to work more on finding & fixing
> bugs, but I am concerned by the general lack of activity and discussion in
> the Cocoa department. Is there any concerted effort underway to get the
> Cocoa port finished, or is it expected to languish until the post-Ganymede
> timeframe?
I'm working on the copy-and-paste stuff for Cocoa, and have been
putting a few patches forwards. The focus of the core SWT developers
is on polishing the non-Cocoa ports at the moment, but are relatively
happy if people submit patches for code in my experience (though there
are some outstanding patches that I've filed against the SWT/Cocoa
port that haven't yet been addressed ...)
> That said, while I would agree there hasn't been much in the way of
> discussion, and things could be more active, I wouldn't call it lethargic,
> either. As you mentioned, Kevin Barnes has been pretty active, and I know
> that Cocoa's capabilities are being considered when adding new API. Activity
> will happen when there's a demand, and that demand is growing.
Good to know there's support internally. And looking forward to your
efforts too, Scott!
Alex