[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [platform-swt-dev] Re: Subclassing Shell
|
No condescension taken. It is a good point. I come from an Objective-C
background, where the boundaries are sliced somewhat differently anyway, so
I occasionally have to lookup the semantics. I presume, however, that they
are not made protected in order to facilitate package access. :) I'm
looking for that distinction.
regards,
Christian.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Stanchfield" <scott@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 8:56 PM
Subject: RE: [platform-swt-dev] Re: Subclassing Shell
> > Protected, however, really is exclusive to
> > sub-classes, so I'm curious what the benefit is, or the
> > detriment to simply hiding them further.
>
> Fyi -- protected means subclasses or others in the same package. Not
trying
> to condescend here, but I like to point this out because it is a
difference
> from how C++ defines protected....
>
> -- Scott
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> platform-swt-dev mailing list
> platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-swt-dev
>
>
