RE: RE: [platform-swt-dev] org.eclipse.swt.SWT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

RE: RE: [platform-swt-dev] org.eclipse.swt.SWT

From: Weiqi Gao <weiqigao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 28 Feb 2003 06:47:45 -0600
Delivered-to: platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://dev.eclipse.org/pipermail/platform-swt-dev/>
List-help: <mailto:platform-swt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-swt-dev>, <mailto:platform-swt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-swt-dev>, <mailto:platform-swt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization:

On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 03:17, vellapillli_h.indukumar@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> If you have good
> arguments against some usage of setters-getters, provide them.

Is that all?  A hundred post thread about setters and getters?  Well,
here's some arguments against setters and getters:

1. They are not object-oriented.
2. They are goofy.

-- 
Weiqi Gao
weiqigao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

References:
- RE: RE: [platform-swt-dev] org.eclipse.swt.SWT
  - From: vellapillli_h . indukumar

Prev by Date: RE: RE: [platform-swt-dev] org.eclipse.swt.SWT
Next by Date: RE: [platform-swt-dev] Tab order & drawing (Z) order
Previous by thread: RE: RE: [platform-swt-dev] org.eclipse.swt.SWT
Next by thread: RE: RE: [platform-swt-dev] org.eclipse.swt.SWT
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs