Re: [platform-swt-dev] GTK in CVS

[Steve_Northover@xxxxxxx]

Also, the new doc says G_LOG_FLAG_RECURSIVE instead of G_LOG_FLAG_RECURSION.

Steve

Havoc Pennington <hp@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent by: platform-swt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx 12/06/01 07:16 PM Please respond to platform-swt-dev

To:        platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx         cc:                 Subject:        Re: [platform-swt-dev] GTK in CVS

Steve_Northover@xxxxxxx writes:
> So, given that the API fails silently, are the exact strings that I need 
> to
> pass in "Gtk", "Gdk", "GLib", "GdkPixbuf"?  I think I'll wait on the rest
> until we actually use the API.

Yes, those are right, except now that I look GdkPixbuf is broken and
uses the default domain - sigh.

I filed a bug:
  http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66412

> Actually, if example from the doc used "gtk" or some string that's not
> NULL, I wouldn't have make the mistake in the first place.

I fixed the docs to have several examples, so it should be clear now.

Havoc
_______________________________________________
platform-swt-dev mailing list
platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-swt-dev