[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [platform-releng-dev] org.eclipse.platform vs.org.eclipse.platform.ide
|
> So my questions are:> · Why the integration
flag ?We just keep doing "I-builds" until we are
satisfied with one, and then "rename" it. And, you can not rename
anything in the bundles, features or "versions" -- just the "outer"
names of where things are collected as zip files, and similar. So, yes, the "I" is expected. (In September,
you will you will see the maintenance builds will be "M"). Why not do "one more build" and change everything
to an "R"? Two reasons: a) something beyond our control could
go wrong if depending on a "final build" so why bother, and b)
We are often not sure if really is the final build until quite some time
after we produce the build -- by which time others have already been "building
with" the build with the "I" qualifiers. Case in point,
we did an "RC4a" build this season, but "internally"
it is just a small change to I-qualifiers. Otherwise we'd need a "big
change" to have an additional "R-build". > · What’s the difference
between the two IUs:
> org.ecplise.platform and org.eclipse.platform.ide ?> o Can I safely continue to use org.ecplise.platform
instead of
> org.ecplise.platform.ide ?org.eclipse.platform is the one you want. It is a
"feature" which you can use to create your own "product"
(product in the Eclipse sense). org.eclipse.platform.ide is a "product"
and usually not the thing you want to "include". HTHFrom:
Ahmet Bilgin <a.bilgin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>To:
"platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx"
<platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Date:
06/23/2016 04:39 AMSubject:
[platform-releng-dev]
org.eclipse.platform vs. org.eclipse.platform.ideSent by:
platform-releng-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Hello, I’m using b3aggregator to create our company-internal
Neon Release P2-Site. When adding the Neon Release repository as contribution
to the b3aggregator,I can see that the product org.eclipse.platform.ide
still has the “Integration”-flag. Is this a mistake or intended? I’m building an Eclipse RCP Application
and have used the product org.eclipse.platform.ide in my PDE targetdefinition
until now. Since Eclipse Neon is released I’ve expected that the integration
flag in the version specifier would be removed from this IU.Instead I’m using the IU org.eclipse.platform
now and my Eclipse RCP Application still can be build because it seems
to have all the necessary dependencies included. So my questions are:· Why
the integration flag ?· What’s
the difference between the two IUs: org.ecplise.platform and org.eclipse.platform.ide
?o Can
I safely continue to use org.ecplise.platform instead of org.ecplise.platform.ide
? Best regardsAhmet Bilgin MAGMA Gießereitechnologie Gesellschaft
für Gießerei-, Simulations- und Regeltechnik mbH | Kackertstr. 11, 52072
Aachen, Germany | Rechtsform GmbH, Amtsgericht Aachen HRB 3912, UST-ID-Nr.
DE121745780 | Geschäftsführung: Dr. Marc C. Schneider (Vorsitzender),
Dr.-Ing. Jörg C. Sturm _______________________________________________
platform-releng-dev mailing list
platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-releng-dev