Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [platform-releng-dev] Rebuilds and RC4


Is this something we could incrementally fixed before 3.4 final date ? We know we may have a couple critical issues to address post RC4, this could be one of them...
RC4 really needs to be done today.



Pascal Rapicault <Pascal_Rapicault@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: platform-releng-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

06/07/2008 01:54 PM

Please respond to
"Eclipse platform release engineering list."        <platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To
"Eclipse platform release engineering list." <platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
"Eclipse platform release engineering list." <platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, platform-releng-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject
Re: [platform-releng-dev] Rebuilds and RC4





The problem is described in https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=236157
It is not a new regression, but something that a lot of people have been encountering lately and I'm afraid could happen even more frequently when servers are loaded.
Also the overall nature of the fix is safe, since it mostly consists in adding checks and building statuses.


Inactive hide details for Philippe P Mulet ---06/07/2008 04:06:11 AM---What is the nature of the p2 problem ?  What is the bug Philippe P Mulet ---06/07/2008 04:06:11 AM---What is the nature of the p2 problem ? What is the bug number ? Is this a regression recently intr

From:

Philippe P Mulet <philippe_mulet@xxxxxxxxxx>

To:

"Eclipse platform release engineering list." <platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date:

06/07/2008 04:06 AM

Subject:

Re: [platform-releng-dev] Rebuilds and RC4






What is the nature of the p2 problem ? What is the bug number ? Is this a regression recently introduced ?

If not, I would argue to let RC4 conclude, and discuss how we fix the new problem and when independantly (3.4.1?).


Please remember that Ganymede relies on us making our schedule...


Pascal Rapicault <Pascal_Rapicault@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: platform-releng-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

06/07/2008 06:03 AM

Please respond to
"Eclipse platform release engineering list." <platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>


To
eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx, "Eclipse platform release engineering list." <platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
[platform-releng-dev] Rebuilds and RC4







I have a dilemma: from a p2 standpoint RC4 could be declared. However during the afternoon the testing for a fix uncovered a new problem that we would like to fix.
Therefore the question is: should I say no go on RC4 and wait for a re-build on Monday along with some other doc changes or should we call RC4 done and do an extra RC?

Thx

PaScaL
_______________________________________________
platform-releng-dev mailing list
platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-releng-dev



Sauf indication contraire ci-dessus:/ Unless stated otherwise above:
Compagnie IBM France
Siège Social : Tour Descartes, 2, avenue Gambetta, La Défense 5, 92400 Courbevoie
RCS Nanterre 552 118 465
Forme Sociale : S.A.S.
Capital Social : 542.737.118 euros
SIREN/SIRET : 552 118 465 02430

_______________________________________________
platform-releng-dev mailing list
platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-releng-dev

_______________________________________________
platform-releng-dev mailing list
platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-releng-dev



Sauf indication contraire ci-dessus:/ Unless stated otherwise above:
Compagnie IBM France
Siège Social : Tour Descartes, 2, avenue Gambetta, La Défense 5, 92400 Courbevoie
RCS Nanterre 552 118 465
Forme Sociale : S.A.S.
Capital Social : 542.737.118 euros
SIREN/SIRET : 552 118 465 02430


Back to the top