[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [platform-releng-dev] releng contributions to 8am build
|
I would recommend using "3.3" as the target milestone for these cosmetical
doc changes post RC4.
Anyone disagreeing ? Adding a RC5 feels overkill given the nature of the
changes (would we want to officialize this with an endgame, test pass
etc... ?).
Daniel Megert
<daniel_megert@ch
.ibm.com> To
Sent by: "Eclipse platform release
platform-releng-d engineering list."
ev-bounces@eclips <platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
e.org cc
Subject
14/06/2007 10:00 Re: [platform-releng-dev] releng
contributions to 8am build
Please respond to
"Eclipse platform
release
engineering
list."
<platform-releng-
dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
What target milestone should we use for changes > '3.3 RC4'?
Dani
Kim Moir
<Kim_Moir@xxxxxx.
com> To
Sent by: platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
platform-releng-d cc
ev-bounces@eclips
e.org Subject
[platform-releng-dev] releng
contributions to 8am build
13.06.2007 23:48
Please respond to
"Eclipse platform
release
engineering
list."
<platform-releng-
dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
doc fixes in org.eclipse.test
Welcome page overview tagline is obsolete
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=192180
Update 3.3 release notes
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=185753
Updated copyright in rcp branding plugin
Update to latest Orbit reccommended build which meant updating qualifiers
in platform.doc.isv and jdt.doc.isv options files
Kim_______________________________________________
platform-releng-dev mailing list
platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-releng-dev
_______________________________________________
platform-releng-dev mailing list
platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-releng-dev
