[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [platform-releng-dev] Performance results for 3.1RC3 available
|
We also see some strange results for the 3.0 run in JDT Text land giving us
red tests.
Dani
Sonia Dimitrov
<Sonia_Dimitrov@c
a.ibm.com> To
Sent by: "Eclipse platform release
platform-releng-d engineering list."
ev-bounces@eclips <platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
e.org cc
Subject
22.06.2005 16:44 Re: [platform-releng-dev]
Performance results for 3.1RC3
available
Please respond to
"Eclipse platform
release
engineering
list."
<platform-releng-
dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Frederic,
I will rerun the jdt core tests only today. I hesitate to do this for
everyone since the whole operation takes about 20 hours to complete and I
don't want this to interfere with upcoming 3.1RC4 builds.
Sonia
Frederic Fusier
<frederic_fusier@fr.i
bm.com> To
Sent by: Sonia Dimitrov/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA
platform-releng-dev-b cc
ounces@xxxxxxxxxxx platform-releng-dev-bounces@eclipse.
org, "Eclipse platform release
engineering list."
06/22/2005 09:51 AM <platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject
Re: [platform-releng-dev]
Please respond to Performance results for 3.1RC3
"Eclipse platform available
release engineering
list."
Sonia,
As for RC3, yesterday's nightly build still show invalid results for these
two tests.
I think a rebuild of 3.0 reference is really necessary as current results
show performance regressions and can be misinterpreted by users!
Cordialement/Regards,
Frédéric
Frederic
Fusier/France/IBM
@IBMFR To
Sent by: "Eclipse platform release
platform-releng-d engineering list."
ev-bounces@eclips <platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
e.org cc
platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx,
platform-releng-dev-bounces@eclipse
06/21/2005 05:21 .org
PM Subject
Re: [platform-releng-dev]
Performance results for 3.1RC3
Please respond to available
"Eclipse platform
release
engineering
list."
Some of our tests get abnormal times for 3.0 reference on Linux boxes:
1) Scenario:
org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.performance.FullSourceWorkspaceBuildTests#testFullBuildDefault()
(RHEL 3.0 Sun 1.4.2_08 (3 GHz 2 GB)):
http://fullmoon.torolab.ibm.com/downloads/drops/S-3.1
RC3-200506171618/performance/linux2/org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.performance.FullSourceWorkspaceBuildTests.testFullBuildDefault().html#Elapsed%20Process
2) Scenario:
org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.performance.FullSourceWorkspaceSearchTests#testIndexing()
(RHEL 3.0 Sun 1.4.2_08 (2 GHz 512 MB)):
http://fullmoon.torolab.ibm.com/downloads/drops/S-3.1
RC3-200506171618/performance/linux/org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.performance.FullSourceWorkspaceSearchTests.testIndexing().html#Elapsed%20Process
All other tests on these boxes and WinXP ones are correct
Would it be possible to investigate what happen and if possible rerun 3.0
references to get correct output?
Thanks
Cordialement/Regards,
Frédéric
Sonia Dimitrov
<Sonia_Dimitrov@c
a.ibm.com> To
Sent by: platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
platform-releng-d cc
ev-bounces@eclips
e.org Subject
[platform-releng-dev] Performance
results for 3.1RC3 available
06/21/2005 05:05
PM
Please respond to
"Eclipse platform
release
engineering
list."
Performance results for 3.1RC3 are available here:
http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops/S-3.1
RC3-200506171618/performance/performance.php
Sonia_______________________________________________
platform-releng-dev mailing list
platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-releng-dev
_______________________________________________
platform-releng-dev mailing list
platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-releng-dev
_______________________________________________
platform-releng-dev mailing list
platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-releng-dev
_______________________________________________
platform-releng-dev mailing list
platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-releng-dev
