platform-doc-dev

Re: [platform-doc-dev] Project meta data is out of date for eclipse.platform

bfisher2@xxxxxxx (Bret Fisher) — Fri, 05 Aug 2011 22:54:23 GMT

Why am I getting this message? Remove me please

-----Original Message-----
From: platform-doc-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:platform-doc-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of portal on behalf
of emo
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 12:00 AM
To: platform-doc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [platform-doc-dev] Project meta data is out of date for
eclipse.platform

Mike,
Projects are required to keep meta data up to date using the MyFoundation
Portal (http://portal.eclipse.org/).  The following problems were found with
this project's meta-data:

* The date for release "3.7" is in the past, but the release is not marked
as completed. If it is completed, it should be marked as completed; if it
has been postponed, it should be given a new target date.

_______________________________________________
platform-doc-dev mailing list
platform-doc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-doc-dev

-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1391 / Virus Database: 1518/3810 - Release Date: 08/04/11

[platform-doc-dev] Project meta data is out of date for eclipse.platform

emo@xxxxxxx (portal on behalf of emo) — Fri, 05 Aug 2011 04:00:16 GMT

Mike,
Projects are required to keep meta data up to date using the MyFoundation
Portal (http://portal.eclipse.org/).  The following problems were found
with this project's meta-data:

* The date for release "3.7" is in the past, but the release is not marked
as completed. If it is completed, it should be marked as completed; if it
has been postponed, it should be given a new target date.

[platform-doc-dev] Project meta data is out of date for eclipse.platform

emo@xxxxxxx (portal on behalf of emo) — Tue, 05 Jul 2011 04:00:18 GMT

Mike,
Projects are required to keep meta data up to date using the MyFoundation
Portal (http://portal.eclipse.org/).  The following problems were found
with this project's meta-data:

* The date for release "3.7" is in the past, but the release is not marked
as completed. If it is completed, it should be marked as completed; if it
has been postponed, it should be given a new target date.
* There is no next/future release of this project. All Eclipse projects
must have a "next release" planned and scheduled.

[platform-doc-dev] Fw: [eclipse-dev] Eclipse project committer changes

daniel_megert@xxxxxxx (Daniel Megert) — Thu, 11 Nov 2010 08:36:19 GMT


----- Forwarded by Daniel Megert/Zurich/IBM on 11.11.2010 09:19 -----
|------------>
| From:      |
|------------>
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |John Arthorne                                                                                                           |
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| To:        |
|------------>
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx, cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx                                                                                     |
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Date:      |
|------------>
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |10.11.2010 23:03                                                                                                                                  |
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Subject:   |
|------------>
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |[eclipse-dev] Eclipse project committer changes                                                                                                   |
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|






Eclipse Project Committers: PLEASE READ! Your commit rights may be affected
if you do not act on this message.


For historical reasons, the Eclipse project has a complex set of Unix
permission groups controlling access to its source code. Many of these
groups do not correspond to active component areas, making committer
elections and access management unnecessarily complex for both Eclipse
project committers and Foundation staff. We are seeking to rectify this
situation by creating a normalized Unix group structure that maps directly
to each of our projects and sub-projects. At the same time, we are taking
the opportunity to clear out committers who have been inactive for extended
periods. Essentially, we are only planning to add active committers into
the newly created Unix groups that will control write access to our source
repository.

If you are currently a committer on the Eclipse project
(Platform,JDT,PDE,e4), please review the listing at [1] of proposed
associations between committer IDs and groups. The mapping from Unix groups
to projects in our repository can be found at [2]. No committer who is
active or interested in remaining active should lose commit access to any
source code they currently have write access to. If you believe this has
occurred, please reply to this note on the eclipse-dev mailing list so it
can be corrected. Note that some committers may gain write access to source
code they previously didn't have access to as part of this change. Those
committers are expected to maintain their usual discretion and avoid
modifying code without first discussing with active committers in that
area.

Apologies if you receive this note multiple times. Changing or removing
commit rights is a process we do not take likely, and we are using every
possible channel to make sure committers are made aware of the change.
Component leads are encouraged to forward this note to their component
mailing lists to ensure all committers are reached.

[1] http://wiki.eclipse.org/Eclipse/PMC/Unix_Groups/New_ACLS_By_Committer
[2] http://wiki.eclipse.org/Eclipse/PMC/Unix_Groups/New_ACLS_By_Project
_______________________________________________
eclipse-dev mailing list
eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-dev

[platform-doc-dev] org.eclipse.platform.doc.isv branched for 3.6.x

DJ_Houghton@xxxxxxx (DJ Houghton) — Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:45:58 GMT

FYI: I have branched the org.eclipse.platform.doc.isv project in the R3_6_maintenance branch.

[platform-doc-dev] Project meta data is out of date for eclipse.platform

emo@xxxxxxx (portal on behalf of emo) — Mon, 05 Jul 2010 04:00:12 GMT

Mike, Steve,
Projects are required to keep meta data up to date using the MyFoundation
Portal (http://portal.eclipse.org/).  The following problems were found
with this project's meta-data:

* The date for release "3.6" is in the past, but the release is not marked
as completed. If it is completed, it should be marked as completed; if it
has been postponed, it should be given a new target date.
* There is no next/future release of this project. All Eclipse projects
must have a "next release" planned and scheduled.

[platform-doc-dev] Welcome Ian Bull as a new eclipse.platform.doc Committer

john_arthorne@xxxxxxx (portal on behalf of John Arthorne) — Tue, 22 Jun 2010 12:59:01 GMT

eclipse.platform.doc Committers,
This automatically generated message marks the completion of all the legal
paperwork and webmaster provisioning for Ian Bull. Ian Bull is a new full
Committer on the eclipse.platform.doc project.

Welcome!

[platform-doc-dev] Committer vote for Ian Bull has been approved by the PMC

portal-noreply@xxxxxxx (portal on behalf of portal-noreply) — Fri, 11 Jun 2010 15:32:02 GMT

eclipse.platform.doc Committers,
This automatically generated message marks the PMC's approval of the vote
for Ian Bull's full Committer status on the eclipse.platform.doc project.
The next step is for the project lead to return to the portal and fill in
the CVS package and employer information for Ian Bull.

The PMC's comments were: Welcome!

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact your project
lead, PMC member, or the EMO

[platform-doc-dev] Committer vote for Ian Bull has concluded successfully

portal-noreply@xxxxxxx (portal on behalf of John Arthorne) — Fri, 11 Jun 2010 14:54:02 GMT

eclipse.platform.doc Committers,
This automatically generated message marks the successful completion of
voting for Ian Bull to receive full Committer status on the
eclipse.platform.doc project. The next step is for the PMC to approve this
vote, followed by the EMO processing the paperwork and provisioning the
account.

Vote summary: 13/0/0 with 30 not voting 
  +1  John Arthorne
   ?  Serge Beauchamp
   ?  Oleg Besedin
   ?  Billy Biggs
  +1  Boris Bokowski
   ?  Szymon Brandys
   ?  Tod Creasey
  +1  Curtis D'Entremont
   ?  Jim Des Rivieres
   ?  Sonia Dimitrov
   ?  Nick Edgar
   ?  Grant Gayed
   ?  Bogdan Gheorghe
   ?  Dejan Glozic
   ?  Chris Goldthorpe
   ?  Kevin Haaland
   ?  Tom Hofmann (nee Eicher)
  +1  DJ Houghton
   ?  Simon Kaegi
  +1  Markus Keller
   ?  Jean-Michel Lemieux
   ?  Carolyn MacLeod
   ?  Kai-Uwe Maetzel
   ?  Jeff McAffer
  +1  Susan McCourt
   ?  Karice McIntyre
  +1  Dani Megert
   ?  Eric Moffatt
  +1  Kim Moir
   ?  Andrew Niefer
  +1  Pascal Rapicault
   ?  Michael Rennie
   ?  Darin Swanson
  +1  Olivier Thomann
  +1  Francis Upton IV
   ?  Michael Valenta
  +1  Thomas Watson
   ?  Paul Webster
   ?  Andre Weinand
   ?  John Wiegand
   ?  Mike Wilson
   ?  Curtis Windatt
  +1  Darin Wright

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact your project
lead, PMC member, or the EMO

[platform-doc-dev] +1 for Ian Bull on eclipse.platform.doc by Kim Moir

portal-noreply@xxxxxxx (portal on behalf of Kim Moir) — Fri, 11 Jun 2010 14:54:01 GMT

Kim Moir voted:
    +1
Absolutely!

Voting summary: http://portal.eclipse.org/