See, you too are hoping that your opinion matters and that your opinion
is included in the decision making process. I expect we all would like
that very much.
I wrote a lengthy reply already. Everyone's opinion matters and it has been shown lately. E.g. stop autoclosing bugs change despite the fact that PMC members and Project leads disagreed with the change.
-1000 for merging in the absence of a cohesive plan that the committers
agree is a good strategy for our project
One kind request here guys - please resist from +100, -1000, +10000 and etc. I've participated in the past in one such conversation - if you veto X, I'll veto Y and things didn't end well so let's try to not do it.
On 31.03.2022 09:53, Christoph Läubrich wrote:
> Am 31.03.22 um 09:42 schrieb Aleksandar Kurtakov:
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 10:35 AM S A
>> <simeon.danailov.andreev@xxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:simeon.danailov.andreev@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>
>> Please first finish the GitHub moves and let that settle for a month
>> (or better, a fe months). There are enough new problems and
>> disruptive changes already.
>>
>>
>> The thing is in order to fix very old problems and some new we have
>> to change things or we are going to add even more bandaid and make it
>> even harder to fix later (as it has happened so many times).
>
> +100
>
> later is just another term for "probably never" in
> software-development ;-)
> _______________________________________________
> platform-dev mailing list
> platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-dev
_______________________________________________
platform-dev mailing list
platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-dev
