| Re: [platform-dev] Github workflow |
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. März 2022 um 17:03 Uhr > Von: "Christoph Läubrich" <laeubi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > An: platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx > Betreff: Re: [platform-dev] Github workflow > > Sorry for confusion then I probably don't get it. What has Egit/Eclipse > Ui to do with gerrit? Nothing. I use Egit to read the history. Because I work with my code from within my IDE, not with github. Gerrit writes url of the PR to the commit header. I can see this url in egit on every commit. I can click it and go directly to the PR in the browser. > If I check with with my eclipse SDK things like "Bug xxxx" are not > linked even though they are on git-eclipse or do you mean > > Reviewed-on:? > > in the commit message if it was merged through gerrit? Exact, see https://git.eclipse.org/c/platform/eclipse.platform.swt.git/commit/?id=43187fa1ce25eb04c7fe417ffd3e1f7bb025577f for example > Github provides similar and as EGit already knows how to handle Github > PRs it should be possible to show such a link, the git magics is > described here: > > https://stackoverflow.com/a/17819027/9503281 No, that's completely different story. It is not in the commit, it adds a lot of "dead" remote branches to your history, making it unusable. See the config I've used and result I've got. So in short, there is no way to get same user experience with github right now. And I for sure don't want this dead pull branches to show up in my history view. > So your best bet would be to ask Egit to add support for this (probably > there is already support for this but I have never used/found that). There is nothing, I'm using latest nightly. Kind regards, Andrey Loskutov Спасение утопающих - дело рук самих утопающих https://www.eclipse.org/user/aloskutov
Attachment:
history_with_pulls.png
Description: PNG image
Attachment:
pull_config.png
Description: PNG image
