Re: [platform-dev] MacOS .dmg vs .tar.gz

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [platform-dev] MacOS .dmg vs .tar.gz

From: Liviu Ionescu <ilg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 18:54:21 +0200
Delivered-to: platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/private/platform-dev>
List-help: <mailto:platform-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-dev>, <mailto:platform-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/options/platform-dev>, <mailto:platform-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

> On 11 Nov 2020, at 18:46, Alex Blewitt <alex.blewitt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On macOS, the .dmg approach is strictly better experience than the .tar.gz approach, so continuing to use this makes sense to me.

The point was not to remove the link to the .dmg, but, since the .tar.gz file is already available, why hide it and not give the choice to the user?

Regards,

Liviu

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [platform-dev] MacOS .dmg vs .tar.gz
  - From: Alex Blewitt

References:
- Re: [platform-dev] MacOS .dmg vs .tar.gz
  - From: Liviu Ionescu
- Re: [platform-dev] MacOS .dmg vs .tar.gz
  - From: Alex Blewitt
- Re: [platform-dev] MacOS .dmg vs .tar.gz
  - From: Liviu Ionescu
- Re: [platform-dev] MacOS .dmg vs .tar.gz
  - From: Liviu Ionescu
- Re: [platform-dev] MacOS .dmg vs .tar.gz
  - From: Liviu Ionescu
- Re: [platform-dev] MacOS .dmg vs .tar.gz
  - From: Liviu Ionescu
- Re: [platform-dev] MacOS .dmg vs .tar.gz
  - From: Alex Blewitt

Prev by Date: Re: [platform-dev] MacOS .dmg vs .tar.gz
Next by Date: Re: [platform-dev] MacOS .dmg vs .tar.gz
Previous by thread: Re: [platform-dev] MacOS .dmg vs .tar.gz
Next by thread: Re: [platform-dev] MacOS .dmg vs .tar.gz
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs