Cross-posting as instructed by Darin.
From: Gaff, Doug
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006
4:29 PM
To: Device
Debugging developer discussions
Subject: Raw notes from today's
meeting
Hi folks,
Here are my notes from today. Pete and I will follow
up on logistics and agenda for the Toronto
meeting. Please send agenda ideas to this mailing list.
Doug
1/13/2006, 2:57
PM DD Meeting
Attendees
Darin Wright, Pete Nichols, Alan Boxall, Jeff Turnham, Samantha Chan - IBM
Chris Recoskie, Martin Imrisek,
Dobrin Alexiev - TI
Doug Schaefer, Mikhail Khodjaiants
- QNX
Doug Gaff, Pawel Piech, Randy
Rohrbach, Ted Williams, Felix Burton - WR
Joanne Woo - MV
Ken Ryall - Nokia
Kirk Beitz - Freescale
Mark Bozeman - ATI/Mentor
Pawel presentation and discussion
(attached)
Darin thinks this should live in
the platform.
The platform design is already
close to what we want.
They are in feature freeze crunch
time, though, so timing is a problem.
Which companies need this?
- IBM
- generic concept makes sense, but worried about scaling (like in the
parallel world)
- IBM
Darin - from a Java point of view, it's a nice to have, but not a strong
requirement.
- TI -
would like to see this by summertime (in CDT). Interested in lending
a hand on the platform debug views, too. Would be helpful if we all
contributed one resource to this - divide and conquer.
- QNX
- not a strong customer demand for commercial product, but from CDT
perspective, would need to provide.
- MV
- not a top priority for them, but it's in the wish list. But would
use if implemented through CDT.
- Nokia
- really important for them. Legacy product does this, and they will
need it. Willing to work on this with CDT.
- Freescale
- definitely interested, but timeframe is farther out. For some
products, this is a hard requirement. Will work on additional use
cases.
- ATI/Mentor
- definitely interested, especially from the view standpoint.
- WR -
important for our commercial product.
Darin's thoughts on adding
contributors: Getting help on this is good, but Darin and team still need
to review contributions to commit. Also they are probably more
experienced in other use cases besides ours. Darin would like a more
technical on-site discussion, though.
Next steps:
- Come
up with some design ideas for the Toronto
meeting: WR, Darin, TI.
- CodeSprint
at EclipseCon
Since a full solution is too much
to get in for 3.2, the idea is to have basic extensibility in Platform, and
then do a DD supplied plug-in.
Terminology: let's use
"scopes" instead of "contexts" to describe what views are
pinned to.
Darin Update on Flexible Hierarchy
Since M4 - continuing to evolve
the flexible hierarchy support. Package / method name changes.
Tree viewer - working on support
for virtual tree support in tree view. Labels are lazy-loaded, but
expansion is not.
Some changes to debug manager and
launch dialog.
Next Meeting - face-to-face
Toronto - IBM labs
Wed, Thurs 2/22 - 2/23 - all day
Fri 2/24 - half day