[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[List Home]
|
Re: [platform-cvs-dev] Bug 36436: [Merge] CVS substituted keywords treated as conflicts
|
- From: Szymon Brandys <Szymon.Brandys@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:29:49 +0200
- Delivered-to: platform-cvs-dev@eclipse.org
Axel,
This list is going to be closed. See
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=307424
If you want to ping a committer about your patches, please use appropriate
bugs.
If there is no bugs describing your issue, rise one.
Thank you
--
Szymon Brandys
Axel Müller
<aegges@xxxxxx>
Sent by: To
platform-cvs-dev- platform-cvs-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
bounces@xxxxxxxxx cc
rg
Subject
Re: [platform-cvs-dev] Bug 36436:
2010-07-19 22:03 [Merge] CVS substituted keywords
treated as conflicts
Please respond to
"Eclipse CVS
Integration
developers list."
<platform-cvs-dev
@eclipse.org>
Is this mailing list dead? No answer for 3 months. Or is nobody interested
in
this patches?
Axel
> Hmm, my patch for the Sync Preview works only if the files to be merged
> differ only in the CSV keywords. If there are additional changes I still
> get a conflict shown in the preview even if the changes do not conflict.
> Which class does determine if there is a conflict? I could not find it.
>
> Axel
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have submitted two patches to a address the problems mentioned in
> > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=36436
> >
> > The first patch adds the -kk option to the CVS merge command when the
> > merge
> >
> > is done without preview into the local workspace.
> >
> > The second patch modifies the compare function in the Sync Preview so
> > that
> >
> > CVS keywords are ignored and thus do not create pseudo conflicts.
> >
> > I would suggest to split the existing bug entry into two separate bugs.
> > The two patches that I have submitted are completely independent and
> > provide
> >
> > fixes for two that independent problems (well, the symptoms are
> > identical but the cause is different).
> >
> > I would be happy if somebody could have a look at them. Any thoughts?
> >
> > Axel
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > platform-cvs-dev mailing list
> > platform-cvs-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-cvs-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> platform-cvs-dev mailing list
> platform-cvs-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-cvs-dev
_______________________________________________
platform-cvs-dev mailing list
platform-cvs-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-cvs-dev