[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [platform-ant-dev] Bugzilla practices proposal
|
Sounds good to me...we have been doing something similar to this in Ant land
for some time.
Very useful for verification and for rollback.
Remembering to do fully qualified names for deletion is a good trick
We really need to write a plugin that will do all this work for us :-)
Darins
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jared Burns" <jaredburns@xxxxxxx>
To: <platform-debug-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <jdt-debug-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
<platform-ant-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 4:33 PM
Subject: [platform-ant-dev] Bugzilla practices proposal
> Some of you may have noticed that I started annotating all of the bugs I
> fixed with every file I checked in for that bug. Having just gone back
> and looked at one of my previous check-ins using this information, I'm
> convinced that it would be a useful practice for all of us.
>
> Unfortunately, CVS can't tell us which files were checked in together.
> But annotating Bugzilla this way lets us get the information back if we
> really need it. The format I've been using can be seen here:
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=53222&comment=9#c9
>
> It's basically -
> Changes to:
> File1 - Brief description
> File2 - Brier description
> etc.
>
> The one additional thing I'd propose that I haven't been doing yet is to
> include the fully qualified path of any files that we delete. In the
> example I referenced above, I actually wanted to go back and restore a
> file (DebugContextManager) from the repository. If I'd have included the
> fully qualified name, it would have saved me a couple minutes.
>
> Sound good/bad/ugly?
>
> Thanks,
> - Jared
>
> _______________________________________________
> platform-ant-dev mailing list
> platform-ant-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-ant-dev
>
