[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [pdt-dev] pdt roadmap
|
hi Jacek
> as far as I know, the team is focusing on stability, performance and usability of PDT - picking the bugzilla bugs appropriately.
> Are there any particular issues you believe deserve more effort?
Well that sounds reasonable. The only nasty issue that I experience from time to time is the error "Zero or negative length StyleRange", but that has already been noticed (https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=331220). 2.2 is by far the best release of pdt. I am quite happy :)
Personally I think pdt would benefit from adding refactoring functionality. I looked at the LTK-toolkit, I guess we could use this? I am not a pdt developer so forgive my ignorance but is it possible to access PDT's language model from within LTK's extension points?
I think this would be needed if you are about to change a class name and you want to update the file {name, location} automatically.
> I'm sorry about the e-mails about outdated plans. It's unfortunate :-(
>
> ________________________________________
> From: pdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [pdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] on behalf of Sjaak Eenhuis [exceptione@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 18 January 2011 21:33
> To: pdt-dev
> Subject: [pdt-dev] pdt roadmap
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I would like to ask if there is a roadmap for pdt. If I am not mistaken, from time to time we get a message on this list that the project plan is outdated or missing.
> At least http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?projectid=tools.pdt hasn't changed for a long time :D
>
> Do we have any special plans for the next pdt version?
>
