[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Was R1_0_2_20071209.created
from the R1_0_2_20071125 branch ?
I put fixes into R1_0_2_20071125 on the 8th
of Dec, but the latest 20071209 integration build did not contain them,
so I am assuming this new branch doesn't contain them either.
Cheers
Dave Kelsey
"Guy Gurfinkel"
<guy.g@xxxxxxxx>
Sent by: pdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
09/12/2007 09:13
|
Please respond to
PDT Developers <pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
|
To
| "PDT Developers" <pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| [pdt-dev] New branch |
|
Hi,
I have created a new branch for
PDT 1.0.2
called R1_0_2_20071209.
Only bug fixes that should be included in
this version should be committed
to that branch. Development for future releases
should be committed to the head. No
merge will be made so
this means in case
you commit something
to the branch you
also have
to commit it to the
head.
Guy Gurfinkel,
Team Leader, Development Tools
Zend._______________________________________________
pdt-dev mailing list
pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
