[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
I am a little surprised to hear that
you could create an integration build and make it publically available
without dealing with the legal issues. If you are able to release integration
builds publically like this to avoid legal issues then why can't you release
a stable build in the same way ?
I am guessing that the integration builds
since rc2 release contained the code that has not be approved yet. Would
it not be better to remove the integration builds from public download
and stick with rc2 for now ?
Dave Kelsey
"Yossi Leon"
<yossi@xxxxxxxx>
Sent by: pdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
29/03/2007 12:01
Please respond to
PDT Developers <pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
To
| <tmo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "PDT
Developers" <pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| RE: [pdt-dev] PDT 1.0 |
|
Hi Thomas and Dave,
Since the project is in incubation it’s
possible to have IP issues as part of the build. Once I call it 0.7 it’s
like ignoring Eclipse process and declaring the release by myself which
I’m sure is not acceptable by Eclipse.org.
The latest integration from Feb 26 is the
most stable and relevant version.
What do you suggest?
--
Yossi Leon
Product Manager, Development Tools
& PDT Project Leader
yossi@xxxxxxxx http://www.zend.com/
+1-212-645-0040
http://blogs.zend.com/author/yossi/
From: pdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:pdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thomas M. Ose
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 12:49 PM
To: 'PDT Developers'
Subject: RE: [pdt-dev] PDT 1.0
Yossi,
I would have to agree with
Dave that we need a base release to bring everyone to the same playing
field, even if it is stable release of the last integration build and call
it 0.7
Thomas M. Ose
Ose Micro Solutions, Inc.
From: pdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:pdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dave Kelsey
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 6:14 AM
To: PDT Developers
Subject: Re: [pdt-dev] PDT 1.0
Yossi, I think you need to release a 0.7 version. Currently there are users
on Rc2, others on various integration builds and I think it would be better
to have a single version that all users download and report on until 1.0
is delivered. It will be confusing for both users and developers if there
are multiple versions.
Regards
Dave Kelsey
"Yossi Leon" <yossi@xxxxxxxx>
Sent by: pdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
28/03/2007 23:01
Please respond to
PDT Developers <pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
To
| <pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| [pdt-dev] PDT 1.0 |
|
Hi All,
I would like to share with you the thoughts regarding PDT 1.0 as you can
see below.
If you find any reason not to skip 0.7 and to move forward with 1.0, please
let us know.
Thanks,
--
Yossi Leon
Product Manager, Development Tools
& PDT Project Leader
yossi@xxxxxxxx http://www.zend.com/
+1-212-645-0040
http://blogs.zend.com/author/yossi/
From: tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Yossi Leon
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 9:51 AM
To: Tools PMC mailing list
Cc: Sharon Corbett
Subject: [tools-pmc] PDT 1.0
Hi All,
PDT 0.7 was scheduled to be planned for the end February 2007. Due to IP
issues that are now being investigated the release was postponed.
The roadmap is to have PDT 1.0 on September 2007 which contains mainly
stability and few enhancements comparing to PDT 0.7.
I would like to propose not to wait for the IP approval and for the release
of 0.7 and to move forward toward 1.0 (without any release of 0.7) and
start providing builds for that version ASAP.
Please let me know if this is acceptable.
Thanks,
--
Yossi Leon
Product Manager, Development Tools
& PDT Project Leader
yossi@xxxxxxxx http://www.zend.com/
+1-212-645-0040
http://blogs.zend.com/author/yossi/
--
Yossi Leon
Product Manager, Development Tools
& PDT Project Leader
yossi@xxxxxxxx http://www.zend.com/
+1-212-645-0040
http://blogs.zend.com/author/yossi/
_______________________________________________
pdt-dev mailing list
pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
_______________________________________________
pdt-dev mailing list
pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU