Re: [paho-dev] Items for Paho Roadmap

[Ian Craggs <icraggs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Rainer,

thanks for the contributions - I'll be looking at them as soon as I can.

I would be hesitant to declare the existing Makefile obsolete, though, 
unless everyone tells me they are using CMake.

Ian

On 11/09/2015 09:05 PM, Rainer Poisel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> as I am a fan of the CMake build system and I'd like to see support
> for that, I just published a commit for the Paho POSIX C-Client:
>    * https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/59981/
>
> Using CMake should make porting the source code to other platforms and
> maintaining the build scripts easier. Furthermore, using this build
> system it does not matter whether one does an in or out of source tree
> build.
>
> The provided Makefile should now be obsolete. However, I kept and
> adapted it to simplify the migration process for those switching from
> plain GNU Make to CMake.
>
> In case you are interested, I'd be happy to add you to the list of reviewers.
>
> Best regards,
>    Rainer
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:13 AM, Ian Craggs
> <icraggs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I'm planning to put together a release roadmap for Paho for the next year to
> > 18 months.  Items on the list include:
> >
> > - contributing to M2Mqtt: regression tests, disk persistence, maybe some
> > other items
> > - offline buffering (ability to send while not connected) and automatic
> > reconnect for C, Java and JavaScript clients
> > - ongoing embedded client improvements: proper FreeRTOS support,
> > asynchronous clients, build improvements, documentation: porting guides,
> > tutorials, formal MQTTClient-C release
> > - Android service stability - it's possible James has achieved much of this
> > already, but we'll have to
> > - WebSockets support for C, Python clients (any others?)
> > - MQTT-SN to MQTT embedded gateway
> > - MQTT conformance test material
> > - possibly an MQTT forwarder for DMZ (it's been mooted, but I'm not exactly
> > sure what it means)
> >
> > - device management in the form of a LwM2M mapping over MQTT.  However,
> > before we can commit to an implementation plan, the Eclipse Foundation is
> > working to clarify a few legal matters with the OMA.
> >
> >
> > Are there any other items that anyone would like to see?  All comments
> > welcome.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > --
> > Ian Craggs
> > icraggs@xxxxxxxxxx                 IBM United Kingdom
> > Paho Project Lead; Committer on Mosquitto
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > paho-dev mailing list
> > paho-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
> > this list, visit
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/paho-dev
> _______________________________________________
> paho-dev mailing list
> paho-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/paho-dev

--
Ian Craggs
icraggs@xxxxxxxxxx                 IBM United Kingdom
Paho Project Lead; Committer on Mosquitto