Re: [paho-dev] On Paho's opinionated URI validation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [paho-dev] On Paho's opinionated URI validation

From: Michael Klishin <michael.s.klishin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 23:27:27 +0400
Delivered-to: paho-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/paho-dev>
List-help: <mailto:paho-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/paho-dev>, <mailto:paho-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/paho-dev>, <mailto:paho-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

2013/11/13 Ian Craggs <icraggs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

What does everyone else think?

More details for implementers covered in the standard/spec will reduce the amount

of fragmentation between ecosystem projects. Sounds like a good idea to me.

--
MK

http://github.com/michaelklishin
http://twitter.com/michaelklishin

References:
- [paho-dev] On Paho's opinionated URI validation
  - From: Michael Klishin
- Re: [paho-dev] On Paho's opinionated URI validation
  - From: Andy Piper
- Re: [paho-dev] On Paho's opinionated URI validation
  - From: Michael Klishin
- Re: [paho-dev] On Paho's opinionated URI validation
  - From: Ian Craggs

Prev by Date: Re: [paho-dev] Building the C++ API/samples
Next by Date: Re: [paho-dev] On Paho's opinionated URI validation
Previous by thread: Re: [paho-dev] On Paho's opinionated URI validation
Next by thread: Re: [paho-dev] On Paho's opinionated URI validation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Back to the top