Re: [paho-dev] Paho Project call this Tuesday 19th

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [paho-dev] Paho Project call this Tuesday 19th - lots of topics...

From: "Mike Milinkovich" <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 14:24:15 -0400
Delivered-to: paho-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/paho-dev>
List-help: <mailto:paho-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/paho-dev>, <mailto:paho-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/paho-dev>, <mailto:paho-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Eclipse Foundation
Thread-index: AQFvpoCkc2L5n/3TYsb2pAkRPORyiJlnKk9g

I am not sure if the Paho project discussion is the right place to resolve this, but the meta-issue at play with the IANA port renaming is that no one seems to be very clear on who owns the MQTT trademark. By default, I assume that’s IBM. Or maybe IBM and Eurotech. Or maybe Andy S-C and Arlen Nipper. It would sure be nice to have a definitive answer to that. Then we can next decide on what we want to see for the future.

- mailing list topics: security; …. re-registration/renaming of IANA assigned ports (ALL)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [paho-dev] Paho Project call this Tuesday 19th - lots of topics...
  - From: Dave Locke

References:
- [paho-dev] Paho Project call this Tuesday 19th - lots of topics...
  - From: andypiperuk@xxxxxxxxx

Prev by Date: [paho-dev] Paho Project call this Tuesday 19th - lots of topics...
Next by Date: Re: [paho-dev] Paho Project call this Tuesday 19th - lots of topics...
Previous by thread: [paho-dev] Paho Project call this Tuesday 19th - lots of topics...
Next by thread: Re: [paho-dev] Paho Project call this Tuesday 19th - lots of topics...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs